ReviewFrontiers in oncology2024
Recent progress in Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy detection of biomarkers in liquid biopsy for breast cancer.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Accuracy of AI-based raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Lasers in medical science · 2026Pooled it
- Machine learning enhanced optical spectroscopy for breast cancer diagnosis: A review.Lasers in medical science · 2026Review
- A Comprehensive Oncological Biomarker Framework Guiding Precision Medicine.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Exosomes in Precision Oncology and Beyond: From Bench to Bedside in Diagnostics and Therapeutics.Cancers · 2025Review
- Advancing Breast Cancer Diagnosis: Optimization of Raman Spectroscopy for Urine-Based Early Detection.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Recent advances in applications of artificial intelligence-assisted Raman spectroscopy in diagnosis of cancers.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
- Hot-spot empowered gold nanoparticles for theranostics in breast cancer.Theranostics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women globally and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. However, current detection methods, such as X-rays, ultrasound, CT scans, MRI, and mammography, have their limitations. Recently, with the advancements in precision medicine and technologies like artificial intelligence, liquid biopsy, specifically utilizing Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS), has emerged as a promising approach to detect breast cancer. Liquid biopsy, as a minimally invasive technique, can provide a temporal reflection of breast cancer occurrence and progression, along with a spatial representation of overall tumor information. SERS has been extensively employed for biomarker detection, owing to its numerous advantages such as high sensitivity, minimal sample requirements, strong multi-detection ability, and controllable background interference. This paper presents a comprehensive review of the latest research on the application of SERS in the detection of breast cancer biomarkers, including exosomes, circulating tumor cells (CTCs), miRNA, proteins and others. The aim of this review is to provide valuable insights into the potential of SERS technology for early breast cancer diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.