ArticleHeliyon2024
Optimizing flood predictions by integrating LSTM and physical-based models with mixed historical and simulated data.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine and deep learning-based forecast of Tehran's accelerating nighttime surface heat island crisis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrating numerical models with deep learning techniques for flood risk assessment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evolution from the physical process-based approaches to machine learning approaches to predicting urban floods: a literature review.Environmental systems research · 2025Review
- Sarcopenia in liver transplantation: A comprehensive bibliometric study of current research trends and future directions.Open life sciences · 2025Article
- Modeling Temperature-Dependent Photoluminescence Dynamics of Colloidal CdS Quantum Dots Using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Networks.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Applications of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Networks in Polymeric Sciences: A Review.Polymers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current flood forecasting models heavily rely on historical measured data, which is often insufficient for robust predictions due to practical challenges such as high measurement costs and data scarcity. This study introduces a novel hybrid approach that synergistically combines the outputs of traditional physical-based models with historical data to train Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks. Specifically, the NAM hydrological model and the HD hydraulic model are employed to simulate flood processes. Focusing on the Jinhua basin, a typical plains river area in China, this research evaluates the efficacy of LSTM models trained on measured, mixed, and simulated datasets. The LSTM architecture includes multiple layers, with optimized hyperparameters tailored for flood forecasting. Key performance indicators such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Peak-relative Error (PRE) are employed to assess the predictive accuracy of the models. The findings demonstrate that LSTM models trained on mixed datasets with a simulated-to-measured data ratio of less than 2:1 consistently achieve superior performance, exhibiting significantly lower RMSE and MAE values compared to models trained on mixed data with larger data ratios. This highlights the advantage of integrating measured and simulated data, leveraging the strengths of both data types to enhance model accuracy. Despite its advantages, the approach has limitations, including dependence on the quality of simulated data and potential computational complexity. However, the development of this hybrid model marks a significant advancement in flood forecasting, offering a promising solution to the challenges of computational efficiency and data scarcity. Potential applications of this approach include real-time flood prediction and risk management in other flood-prone regions, providing a robust framework for integrating diverse data sources to improve forecasting accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.