ArticleHeliyon2024
Influence of apolipoprotein E gene polymorphisms on coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary angiography.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Previous studies have shown that apolipoprotein E (ApoE) gene polymorphisms have an impact on coronary artery disease(CAD). However, many studies have small sample sizes and different conclusions. The purpose was to retrospectively study the influence of ApoE gene polymorphisms on CAD. Methods: This study assessed the influence of different ApoE genotypes on coronary heart disease in patients who received coronary angiography and used multivariate logistic regression to assess the influence of different ApoE genotypes on CAD. Results: Patients with different ApoE genotypes had no obvious differences in the incidence of hypertension, diabetes or obesity（P > 0.05). Patients with ε2/ε2 had higher incidence of hypertriglyceridemia than patients with other ApoE genotypes, while patients with ε3/ε3 had a lower incidence of hypertriglyceridemia than those with ε3/ε4,ε4/ε4, ε2/ε3 and ε2/ε2（P < 0.05）. Patients with ε3/ε4, ε4/ε4, ε3/ε3 and ε2/ε2 had no significant differences in the severity or incidence of CAD （P > 0.05). ε2/ε4 and ε2/ε3 reduced the risk of high LDL-C, and reduced the severity and incidence of coronary heart（P < 0.05). ε2/ε3 reduced risk of premature coronary artery disease（PCAD）（P < 0.05). ε2/ε3 reduced risk of CAD in patients age <45,age at 60-74 and age ≥74, while ε2/ε4 reduced risk of CAD in patients age ≥74（P < 0.05). Conclusion: Patients with ε3/ε4, ε4/ε4,ε3/ε3 and ε2/ε2 had no significant differences in the severity and occurrence of CAD. Compared to the isoform ε3 (ε3/ε3), isoform ε4 did not increased the severity and occurrence of CAD. Compared with ApoE other genotypes, ε2/ε3 and ε2/ε4 reduced the risk of high LDL-C and the severity and occurrence of CAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.