ArticleHeliyon2024
Development of a novel prognostic signature for colorectal cancer based on angiogenesis-related genes.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognostic implications and molecular mechanisms of derived organoid-angiogenesis-related genes (DOARGs) in colorectal cancer.Journal of physiology and biochemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignant tumor worldwide. Angiogenesis is closely related to tumor metastasis, which is the main cause of cancer death. Although several angiogenesis signatures have been proposed in some cancer types, no angiogenic signature has been developed to predict the prognosis and efficacy of antiangiogenic bevacizumab in CRC patients. Methods: We developed a novel CRC angiogenic signature by refining seven publicly available angiogenic gene sets using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). Immune and stromal cells within the tumor microenvironment were compared between the high- and low-risk groups in more than 1000 CRC samples classified by calculating the risk score based on the customized angiogenic signature. The correlation of this new gene set with the efficacy of bevacizumab was also compared. Results: A new prognostic-associated angiogenesis signature gene set was constructed that can divide CRC patients into two high- and low-risk groups. The high-risk angiogenic group was significantly associated with extracellular matrix organization, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and myogenesis. In addition, the high-risk group had higher infiltration of stromal and immune cells and was more resistant to bevacizumab than the low-risk group. Conclusion: Briefly, we constructed a novel angiogenic signature that can predict the prognosis of CRC patients and the efficacy of bevacizumab in treating CRC. Our results provide new insights into the relationships among angiogenesis, metastasis, and medication for CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.