Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39040255›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Cognition and communication in patients with spinal muscular atrophy: A systematic review.

Sanae Akodad, Delphine De Smedt, Simon Baijot, Hilde Stevens, Nicolas Deconinck

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sanae AkodadInstitute for Interdisciplinary Innovation in Healthcare (I3h), Faculté de Médecine, Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Delphine De SmedtDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Simon BaijotUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, ULB, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Hôpital Universitaire des Enfants Reine Fabiola (HUDERF), Department of Paediatric Neurology and Neuromuscular Reference Center, Brussels, Belgium.
Hilde StevensInstitute for Interdisciplinary Innovation in Healthcare (I3h), Faculté de Médecine, Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Nicolas DeconinckUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, ULB, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Hôpital Universitaire des Enfants Reine Fabiola (HUDERF), Department of Paediatric Neurology and Neuromuscular Reference Center, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

•Synthesizes evidence from 12 studies on cognitive and communicative impacts in SMA, focusing on nuanced functional outcomes.•Highlights cognitive variability in SMA1, revealing subtle challenges in SMA2 and 3, and stresses tailored assessment methodologies.•Identifies communication barriers in SMA, emphasizing the urgency of investigating their potential interplay with cognitive functions.•Stresses integrating cognitive and communicative assessments into SMA management, to enhanceunderstanding of treatment impacts.•Calls for standardized, sensitive tools to evaluate cognition and communication, ensuring consistent assessments across SMA phenotypes.

Indexed as

“Cognition”“Communication skills”“Language”“SMA”“Spinal muscular atrophy”

Identifiers

PMID39040255
PMCPMC11261103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.