Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39040124›Full record

ArticleNew microbes and new infections

Evaluation of MMV Pandemic Response Box compounds to identify potent compounds against clinically relevant bacterial and fungal clinical isolates

Seshan Sivasankar, Appalaraju Boppe, Martin Peter Grobusch, Sankarganesh Jeyaraj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in New microbes and new infections. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seshan SivasankarPSG Center for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, India.
Appalaraju BoppeDepartment of Microbiology, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, India.
Martin Peter GrobuschCenter of Tropical Medicine and Travel Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Sankarganesh JeyarajPSG Center for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Multidrug resistant bacterial and fungal pathogens are resistant to a number of significant front-line drugs, hence, identification of new inhibitory agents to combat them is crucial. In this study, we aim to evaluate the activity of Pandemic Box compounds from Malaria Medicines Venture (MMV) against Methods: Isolates were initially screened with 201 antibacterial and 46 antifungal compounds (10 μM) using a microbroth dilution in triplicates to determine MIC. A persister assay was performed for bacterial pathogens. Results: Out of 201 antibacterial compounds, twenty-nine and seven compounds inhibited the growth of Conclusion: Five compounds from MMV Pandemic Box were found to be inhibiting colistin and ceftazidime resistant

Indexed as

AlexidineBacterial and fungal MDR clinical isolatesEpetraboroleEravacyclineMMV compoundsOteseconazolePersister assay

Identifiers

PMID39040124
PMCPMC11261442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.