ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2024
Suicide-related internet use among mental health patients who died by suicide in the UK: a national clinical survey with case-control analysis.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characteristics of Suicidal Patients Who Engaged in Suicide-Related Internet Use in the United Kingdom: Cross-Sectional Survey Findings.JMIR mental health · 2025Article
- Exploring Suicide-Related Internet Use Among Suicidal Mental Health Patients in the United Kingdom: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.JMIR mental health · 2025Article
- Article
- Machine learning prediction of suicide attempt counts in Poland: Insights from Google trends and historical data.International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Suicide-related internet use (SRIU) has been shown to be linked to suicide. However, there is limited research on SRIU among mental health patients, who are at 4 to 7 times increased risk of suicide compared to the general population. This study aims to address this gap by exploring the prevalence of SRIU among mental health patients who died by suicide in the UK and describing their characteristics. Methods: The study was carried out as part of the National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Safety in Mental Health (NCISH). Data were collected on sociodemographic, clinical, suicide characteristics and engagement in SRIU of patients who died by suicide between 2011 and 2021. The study utilised a case-control design to compare patients who engaged in suicide-related internet use with those who did not. Findings: The presence or absence of SRIU was known for 9875/17,347 (57%) patients; SRIU was known to be present in 759/9875 (8%) patients. The internet was most often used to obtain information on suicide methods (n = 523/759, 69%) and to visit pro-suicide websites (n = 250/759, 33%) with a significant overlap between the two (n = 152/759, 20%). Engaging in SRIU was present across all age groups. The case-control element of the study showed patients who were known to have engaged in SRIU were more likely to have been diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (OR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.43-3.18), have a history of childhood abuse (OR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.36-2.13) and to have received psychological treatment (OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.18-1.74) than controls. Additionally, these patients were more likely to have died on or near a salient date (OR = 2.11, 95% CI: 1.61-2.76), such as a birthday or anniversary. Interpretation: The findings affirm SRIU as a feature of suicide among patients of all ages and highlight that clinicians should inquire about SRIU during assessments. Importantly, as the most common type of SRIU can expand knowledge on suicide means, clinicians need to be aware of the association between SRIU and choice of methods. This may be particularly relevant for patients approaching a significant calendar event. Funding: The Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.