ReviewiScience2024
Macrophage heterogeneity in myocardial infarction: Evolution and implications for diverse therapeutic approaches.
Review in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Short-chain fatty acids promote post-myocardial infarction cardiac repair via FFAR2-dependent suppression of osteoclast-like macrophage differentiation.Basic research in cardiology · 2026Article
- Increased NETosis in Patients With Heart Failure Is Associated With Macrophage Activation Towards a Proinflammatory Phenotype.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Article
- SAMHD1 promotes cardiac repair post myocardial infarction by targeting NR4a1 to regulate macrophage metabolic reprogramming.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- A call to redefine cardiovascular immunobiology around leukocyte plasticity.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2026Article
- Macrophages of the heart: Homeostasis and disease.Biomedical journal · 2026Review
- Exosomes Enhance Diagnosis and Therapy of Ischemic Heart Disease: Insights and Advances.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Review
- Review
- Review
- Impact of Adjuvant Mannitol Administration on the Development of Delirium in Patients with Myocardial Infarction: Results of a Single-Center Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Innovative approaches to boost mesenchymal stem cells efficacy in myocardial infarction therapy.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Adrenergic orchestration of immune cell dynamics in response to cardiac stress.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given the extensive participation of myeloid cells (especially monocytes and macrophages) in both inflammation and resolution phases post-myocardial infarction (MI) owing to their biphasic role, these cells are considered as crucial players in the disease pathogenesis. Multiple studies have agreed on the significant contribution of macrophage polarization theory (M2 vs. M1) while determining the underlying reasons behind the observed biphasic effects; nevertheless, this simplistic classification attracts severe drawbacks. The advent of multiple advanced technologies based on OMICS platforms facilitated a successful path to explore comprehensive cellular signatures that could expedite our understanding of macrophage heterogeneity and plasticity. While providing an overall basis behind the MI disease pathogenesis, this review delves into the literature to discuss the current knowledge on multiple macrophage clusters, including the future directions in this research arena. In the end, our focus will be on outlining the possible therapeutic implications based on the emerging observations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.