Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39040034›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2024

Intensive blood pressure control in isolated systolic hypertension: a post hoc analysis of a cluster randomized trial.

Chang Wang, Songyue Liu, Wei Miao, Ning Ye, Ziyi Xie, Lixia Qiao, Nanxiang Ouyang, Yangzhi Yin, Yingxian Sun, Guozhe Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chang WangDepartment of Cardiology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110001, China.
Songyue LiuDepartment of Cardiology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110001, China.
Wei MiaoDepartment of Cardiology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110001, China.
Ning YeDepartment of Cardiology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110001, China.
Ziyi XieDepartment of Cardiology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110001, China.
Lixia QiaoDepartment of Cardiology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110001, China.
Nanxiang OuyangDepartment of Cardiology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110001, China.
Yangzhi YinDepartment of Cardiology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110001, China.
Yingxian SunDepartment of Cardiology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110001, China.
Guozhe SunDepartment of Cardiology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110001, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) is of high prevalence, with a relatively poor prognosis. However, there is still no direct evidence to demonstrate the benefits of intensive blood pressure (BP) control among these patients. We aimed to evaluate intensive BP control with the target of <130/80 mmHg in ISH. Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of patients with ISH in the China Rural Hypertension Control Project (CRHCP), defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 90 mmHg. The primary outcome was cardiovascular disease (CVD) including stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and CVD death. Mixed-effect Cox proportional regression and generalized estimating equation models were used for analysis. Findings: In total, 7981 patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 8005 to the usual care group between May 8 and November 27, 2018. The median follow-up was 3.02 years (25-75%: 2.98-3.06). Mean systolic/diastolic BP at the end of 36 months follow-up was 126.5/71.2 mmHg in the intensive BP control group and 148.1/78.6 mmHg in the usual care group. The intervention group presented a substantially lower rate of composite CVD compared with the usual care group (1.52% versus 2.30%/year; multiple-adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57-0.72; Interpretation: Intensive BP control (<130/80 mmHg) was effective and safe in patients with ISH for the prevention of CVD events. Funding: The Ministry of Science and Technology (China) of China and the Science and Technology Program of Liaoning Province, China.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular diseaseIntensive blood pressure controlIsolated systolic hypertension

Identifiers

PMID39040034
PMCPMC11262169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.