ArticleArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2024
Classification Criteria for Axial Disease in Youth With Juvenile Spondyloarthritis.
Article in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Adult to Adolescent: Alignment in Clinical Trials and Outcomes in Axial Spondyloarthritis.Arthritis care & research · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in the Pharmacological Management of Pediatric Spondyloarthritis.Paediatric drugs · 2026Review
- Measuring the Impact: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Response of Sacroiliac Joints to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Youth With Axial Disease.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Sex differences in clinical and imaging characteristics of axial juvenile spondyloarthritis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Recognition of Juvenile Ankylosing Spondylitis in an Adolescent Female Presenting to a Chiropractor.Cureus · 2026Article
- Advancing Juvenile Spondyloarthritis: Closing Knowledge Gaps with New Axial JSpA Classification Criteria.Current rheumatology reports · 2025Review
- Musculoskeletal manifestations in children with inflammatory bowel disease: a multicenter cohort study (GASTROREUM study).Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2025Article
- Core Set of Responsive and Discriminatory Measures for Use in Pragmatic Trials of Youth With Axial Juvenile Spondyloarthritis.Arthritis care & research · 2025Article
- Validation of Axial Juvenile Spondyloarthropathy Criteria in Turkish Juvenile Spondyloarthropathy Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Do the Provisional Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation Enthesitis/Spondylitis-Related Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Criteria Capture Youth With Axial Spondyloarthritis?Arthritis care & research · 2025Article
- Juvenile Spondyloarthropathies: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Advances-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- What have we learned from long-term studies in juvenile idiopathic arthritis? - Prediction, classification, transition.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2025Review
- Effect of Characteristic Inflammatory and Structural Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesions on Expert Assessment of Axial Juvenile Spondyloarthritis.The Journal of rheumatology · 2025Article
- Defining axial involvement in juvenile SpA.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe goal was to develop and validate classification criteria for axial juvenile spondyloarthritis (SpA; AxJSpA).
methodsThis international initiative consisted of four phases: (1) item generation, (2) item reduction, (3) criteria development, and (4) validation of the AxJSpA criteria by an independent team of experts in an internationally representative validation cohort.
resultsThese criteria are intended to be used on youth with a physician diagnosis of juvenile SpA and for whom axial disease is suspected. Item generation consisted of a systematic literature review and a free-listing exercise using input from international physicians, which collectively resulted in 108 items. After the item reduction exercise and expert panel input, 37 items remained for further consideration. The final AxJSpA criteria domains included the following: imaging of active inflammation, imaging of structural lesions, pain chronicity, pain pattern, pain location, stiffness, and genetics. The most heavily weighted domains were active inflammation and structural lesions on imaging. Imaging typical of sacroiliitis was deemed necessary, but not sufficient, to classify a youth with AxJSpA. The threshold for classification of AxJSpA was a score of ≥55 (out of 100). When tested in the validation data set, the final criteria had a specificity of 97.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 91.4%-99.7%), sensitivity of 64.3% (95% CI 54.9%-73.1%), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.81 (95% CI 0.76%-0.86%).
conclusionThe new AxJSpA classification criteria require an entry criterion and a physician diagnosis of juvenile SpA and include seven weighted domains. The AxJSpA classification criteria are validated and designed to identify participants for research studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.