Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39039848›Full record

ArticleRenal failure2024

Establishing a differential diagnosis model between primary membranous nephropathy and non-primary membranous nephropathy by machine learning algorithms.

Shangmei Cao, Shaozhe Yang, Bolin Chen, Xixia Chen, Xiuhong Fu, Shuifu Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Renal failure, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shangmei CaoDepartment of Science and Technology Innovation Center, Luohe Central Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Luohe Medical College, Henan Key Laboratory of Fertility Protection and Aristogenesis, Luohe, China.
Shaozhe YangDepartment of Science and Technology Innovation Center, Luohe Central Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Luohe Medical College, Henan Key Laboratory of Fertility Protection and Aristogenesis, Luohe, China.
Bolin ChenDepartment of Science and Technology Innovation Center, Luohe Central Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Luohe Medical College, Henan Key Laboratory of Fertility Protection and Aristogenesis, Luohe, China.
Xixia ChenDivision of Nephrology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Xiuhong FuDepartment of Science and Technology Innovation Center, Luohe Central Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Luohe Medical College, Henan Key Laboratory of Fertility Protection and Aristogenesis, Luohe, China.
Shuifu TangDivision of Nephrology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextFour algorithms with relatively balanced complexity and accuracy in deep learning classification algorithm were selected for differential diagnosis of primary membranous nephropathy (PMN).

objectiveThis study explored the most suitable classification algorithm for PMN identification, and to provide data reference for PMN diagnosis research.

methodsA total of 500 patients were referred to Luo-he Central Hospital from 2019 to 2021. All patients were diagnosed with primary glomerular disease confirmed by renal biopsy, contained 322 cases of PMN, the 178 cases of non-PMN. Using the decision tree, random forest, support vector machine, and extreme gradient boosting (Xgboost) to establish a differential diagnosis model for PMN and non-PMN. Based on the true positive rate, true negative rate, false-positive rate, false-negative rate, accuracy, feature work area under the curve (AUC) of subjects, the best performance of the model was chosen.

resultsThe efficiency of the Xgboost model based on the above evaluation indicators was the highest, which the diagnosis of PMN of the sensitivity and specificity, respectively 92% and 96%.

conclusionsThe differential diagnosis model for PMN was established successfully and the efficiency performance of the Xgboost model was the best. It could be used for the clinical diagnosis of PMN.

Indexed as

Glomerulonephritis, MembranousAdultAlgorithmsBiopsyDecision TreesDeep LearningDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySupport Vector Machineanti-PLA2Rdifferential diagnosisIgGmachine learning algorithmsPrimary membranous nephropathyXgboost model

Identifiers

PMID39039848
PMCPMC11268222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.