ArticleClinical and experimental reproductive medicine2025
Evaluation of the follicular fluid thiol/disulfide balance among patients with poor ovarian response.
Article in Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to compare the thiol/disulfide balance, myeloperoxidase, and ischemia-modified albumin levels in the follicular fluid (FF) of poor ovarian response (POR) and normal ovarian response (NOR) women who received intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
methodsThe study was performed between March 2021 and April 2022 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Ankara City Hospital. The study included 27 POR and 35 NOR women who underwent ICSI. FF was obtained after the controlled ovarian stimulation cycle. The FF thiol/disulfide balance was detected using spectrophotometric methods. A correlation analysis was conducted to determine whether these oxidative stress markers could contribute to predicting oocyte quality.
resultsDisulfide levels were significantly higher in the NOR group than in the POR group (p=0.014). The number of fertilized egg (2PN) oocytes was positively correlated with the total thiol level (r=0.258, p=0.046). The disulfide level was positively correlated with the anti-Müllerian hormone level (r=0.262, p=0.039) and the total number of retrieved oocytes (r=0.335, p=0.008).
conclusionThe disulfide levels differed significantly between the NOR and POR groups. The statistically significant differences of fewer metaphase II oocytes and lower percentage of good-quality embryos in the NOR group compared to the POR group might have resulted from the NOR group's elevated disulfide levels. The total thiol levels correlated with the total of 2PN oocytes. Future studies should examine the thiol/disulfide balance at assisted reproductive technology centers to predict which oocytes could be fertilized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.