Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39039533›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Content validity of patient-reported measures evaluating experiences of the quality of transitions in healthcare settings-a scoping review.

Sisse Walløe, Stine Gundtoft Roikjær, Sebrina Maj-Britt Hansen, Graziella Zangger, Sofie Rath Mortensen, Christoffer Bruun Korfitsen, Charlotte Simonÿ, Henrik Hein Lauridsen, Lars Morsø

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sisse WalløeDepartment of Clinical Research, Research Unit OPEN, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. sisse.walloe@rsyd.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9212-2122
Stine Gundtoft RoikjærDepartment of Physio- and Occupational Therapy, Research- and Implmentation Unit PROgrez, Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, Region Zealand, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5851-7577
Sebrina Maj-Britt HansenDepartment of Clinical Research, Research Unit OPEN, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2784-9421
Graziella ZanggerDepartment of Physio- and Occupational Therapy, Research- and Implmentation Unit PROgrez, Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, Region Zealand, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7606-3273
Sofie Rath MortensenDepartment of Physio- and Occupational Therapy, Research- and Implmentation Unit PROgrez, Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, Region Zealand, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9550-1507
Christoffer Bruun KorfitsenDepartment of Clinical Research, Research Unit OPEN, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2159-7662
Charlotte SimonÿDepartment of Physio- and Occupational Therapy, Research- and Implmentation Unit PROgrez, Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, Region Zealand, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1189-2967
Henrik Hein LauridsenDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5198-5215
Lars MorsøDepartment of Clinical Research, Research Unit OPEN, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3084-4186

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

No reviews so far have been conducted to define the constructs of patient-experienced quality in healthcare transitions or to identify existing generic measures of patients' experience of the quality within healthcare transitions. Our aim was to identify domains relevant for people experiencing healthcare transitions when evaluating the quality of care they have received, map the comprehensiveness of existing patient-reported experience measures (PREM), and evaluate the PREMs' content validity. The method was guided by the Joanna Briggs Institutes' guidance for scoping reviews. The search was performed on 07 December 2021 and updated 27 May 2024, in the electronic databases Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and Cinahl (EBSCO). The search identified 20,422 publications, and 190 studies were included for review. We identified 30 PREMs assessing at least one aspect of adults' experience of transitions in healthcare. Summarising the content, we consider a model with two domains, organisational and human-relational, likely to be adequate. However, a more comprehensive analysis and adequate definition of the construct is needed. None of the PREMs were considered content valid.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of Health CareHumansPatient SatisfactionReproducibility of ResultsHealthcare transitionsPatient ExperiencePatient-Reported Experience MeasureQualityScoping Review

Identifiers

PMID39039533
PMCPMC11265152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.