ArticleBMC cancer2024
Differentiation of granulomatous nodules with lobulation and spiculation signs from solid lung adenocarcinomas using a CT deep learning model.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Noninvasive differentiation of benign and malignant solid pulmonary nodules using multiparameter dual-layer spectral CT radiomics.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- The Relationship Between Pulmonary Spiculation and Central Fibrosis, Along With Other Clinicopathological Features, in Invasive Lung Adenocarcinoma and Its Prognostic Significance.Thoracic cancer · 2026Article
- The role of radiological imaging in differentiating malignant and benign pulmonary nodules: a retrospective study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Predictive value of CT target scan-based radiomics and clinical features for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease combined with malignant pulmonary nodules.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Article
- Predicting invasiveness of subsolid nodules: a HRCT-based model for lung adenocarcinoma.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Completion lobectomy following segmentectomy for malignant lung tumors: a multi-institutional study of surgical feasibility, oncologic outcomes, and diagnostic challenges (ESSG-02 study).Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- [Application of Explainable Deep Learning in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Pulmonary Space-occupying Lesions and Classifying Pathological Subtypes of Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2025Article
- A Lightweight Dual-Output Vision Transformer for Enhanced Lung Nodule Classification Using CT Images.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules has always been a difficult and important point in clinical research, especially granulomatous nodules (GNs) with lobulation and spiculation signs, which are easily misdiagnosed as malignant tumors. Therefore, in this study, we utilised a CT deep learning (DL) model to distinguish GNs with lobulation and spiculation signs from solid lung adenocarcinomas (LADCs), to improve the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative diagnosis.
methods420 patients with pathologically confirmed GNs and LADCs from three medical institutions were retrospectively enrolled. The regions of interest in non-enhanced CT (NECT) and venous contrast-enhanced CT (VECT) were identified and labeled, and self-supervised labels were constructed. Cases from institution 1 were randomly divided into a training set (TS) and an internal validation set (IVS), and cases from institutions 2 and 3 were treated as an external validation set (EVS). Training and validation were performed using self-supervised transfer learning, and the results were compared with the radiologists' diagnoses.
resultsThe DL model achieved good performance in distinguishing GNs and LADCs, with area under curve (AUC) values of 0.917, 0.876, and 0.896 in the IVS and 0.889, 0.879, and 0.881 in the EVS for NECT, VECT, and non-enhanced with venous contrast-enhanced CT (NEVECT) images, respectively. The AUCs of radiologists 1, 2, 3, and 4 were, respectively, 0.739, 0.783, 0.883, and 0.901 in the (IVS) and 0.760, 0.760, 0.841, and 0.844 in the EVS.
conclusionsA CT DL model showed great value for preoperative differentiation of GNs with lobulation and spiculation signs from solid LADCs, and its predictive performance was higher than that of radiologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.