ArticleBMC neurology2024
CHANTER syndrome in the context of pain medication: a case report.
Article in BMC neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCHANTER (Cerebellar Hippocampal and Basal Nuclei Transient Edema with Restricted diffusion) is a recently described syndrome occurring in the context of drug abuse. While clinical findings are rather unspecific (disorientation, unresponsiveness), MR imaging (MRI) discloses a characteristic pattern (restricted diffusion in the basal ganglia and hippocampi, cerebellar oedema and haemorrhage), allowing for timely diagnosis before complications such as cerebellar swelling and herniation do occur. Here we report a case of CHANTER primarily based on imaging findings, as there was no evidence of drug abuse on admission. CASE PRESENTATION: A 62-year-old Patient was admitted to our hospital after being unresponsive at home. Prehospital intubation was performed, which limited neurological assessment. Under these circumstances no obvious symptoms could be determined, i.e. pupils were isocoric and responsive, and there were no signs of seizures. While the initial CT scan was unremarkable, the subsequent MRI scan showed a distinct imaging pattern: moderately enhancing areas in the basal ganglia and hippocampi with diffusion restriction, accompanied by cerebellar haemorrhage and oedema (Figs. 1 and 2). A comprehensive clinical and laboratory work-up was performed, including drug screening, spinal tap, Holter ECG, echocardiography and EEG. The only conspicuous anamnestic finding was a chronic pain syndrome whose medication had been supplemented with opioids two months previously. The opioid medication was discontinued, which led to a rapid improvement in the patient's clinical condition without any further measures. The patient was able to leave the intensive care unit and was discharged 10 days after admission without persistent neurological deficits.
conclusionFamiliarity with typical MRI patterns of toxic encephalopathy in patients from high-risk groups, such as drug abusers, is crucial in emergency neuroradiology. In the presence of typical MRI findings, CHANTER syndrome should be included in the differential diagnosis, even if there is no history of drug abuse, to avoid delay in diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.