ArticleBMC public health2024
Inter-relation between diabetes mellitus and hypertension in terms of incidence and prediction in Saudi Arabia: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Association of Cumulative Average Uric Acid to HDL Cholesterol Ratio with the Risk of Rapidly Declining Renal Function: A Retrospective Community-Based Cohort Study in Shanghai Undertaken on Elderly Subjects with Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- The Impact of Ramadan Fasting on Glycemic and Blood Pressure Control in a Large Saudi Arabian Cohort with Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertension: A Longitudinal Interrupted Time Series Analysis.Health services insights · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHypertension (HTN) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are interconnected metabolic disorders with escalating global incidence and prevalence. However, no longitudinal studies have specifically examined the incidence of HTN and T2DM in the same study population. This study aimed to elucidate the association between HTN and T2DM and ascertain their respective roles in the development of each other.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study encompassed 809 Saudi patients from primary healthcare centers in Al Madinah Al Munawarah, Saudi Arabia. The sample was stratified into three cohorts: 226 patients with HTN but without T2DM, 274 patients with T2DM but without HTN, and 309 patients devoid of both T2DM and HTN. Over a retrospective follow-up period of approximately 5 years, incidence density rates (IDR) were computed for HTN in the T2DM cohort, T2DM in the HTN cohort, and both HTN and T2DM in the control cohort. Multiple logistic regression analysis was employed to identify predictors of HTN and T2DM.
resultsThe IDR of T2DM among patients with HTN stood at 73.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 56, 92) per 1000 person-years, in contrast to 33.9 (95% CI 24, 44) per 1000 person-years in the control cohort (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 7.1, 95%CI 3.55, 14.13). Conversely, the IDR of HTN among patients with type-2 T2DM was 55.9 (95% CI 42, 70) per 1000 person-years, while in the control cohort, it was 20.8 (95% CI 13, 28) per 1000 person-years (adjusted OR = 5.8, 95% CI 3.11, 11.09). Significant predictors of HTN in the logistic regression model encompassed age, smoking status, family history of HTN, T2DM status, and body mass index (BMI). Similarly, significant predictors of T2DM in the logistic regression model included age, sex, family history of T2DM, HTN, and BMI.
conclusionThis study unveils HTN and T2DM as mutually significant risk factors. The IDR of each condition in the presence of the other significantly exceeded that among individuals devoid of HTN or T2DM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.