ArticleBMC women's health2024
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) co-infection, and bacterial antibiogram profile of pregnant women studied in Lagos, Nigeria.
Article in BMC women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fluconazole-resistant vulvovaginal candidiasis in reproductive-age women: a study from Himalayan country.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Effects of fructo-oligosaccharides on genitourinary tract infections and birth outcomes in pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial in Bangladesh.Tropical medicine and health · 2025Article
- Detection of sexually transmitted infection agents in pregnant women using multiplex polymerase chain reaction method.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Non-Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study was undertaken to determine the prevalence of Bacterial Vaginosis (BV), Trichomonas Vaginalis (TV) co-infection, and the antibacterial sensitivity profile of bacterial isolates.
methodsThe study was a cross-sectional study of 232 pregnant women on a routine antenatal visit between April 2019 and Sept. 2020, at Amukoko clinic in Lagos, Nigeria. The gynaecologist conducted the clinical examination on each patient looking for vaginal discharge and its consistency/homogeneity, colour and odour. Two High Vaginal Swab (HVS) samples were taken from every patient and a semi-structured questionnaire was used to gather the socio-demographic, practices/attitudes, and clinical information of each participant. One sample was employed for wet preparation to identify the TV and BV diagnosis using Amsel's criteria and Whiff's test. The second sample was used for bacterial culture and antibiogram was conducted using the disc diffusion technique. The Clinical Laboratory Standard Institutes' (CLSI) interpretative criteria were used to categorise the results.
resultsThe mean age of the clients was 28.11 ± 7.08 years of age. The majority (88%) were aged 15-35 years. Only 81 (34.9%) had microbial organisms isolated or seen from their specimens and 19 (8.2%) of such were classified as having BV (Bacteriods or Gardnerella isolated). Of the 81 infected, 33 (40.8%) had only bacterial infection, 36 (44.4%) had TV alone and 12 (14.8%) had bacteria co-infected with TV. From the clinical records, the population that was classified as having UTI or vaginitis was only 46 (20.7%) The study observed age (15-35 years) related association between vaginosis/ TV co-infection (X
conclusionThere is a relatively low prevalence of BV and flagellate co-infection in the community studied. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend screening of antenatal women with underlying symptoms for BV and flagellates co-infection to avoid its progression to vaginitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.