Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39039474›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Developing the PEAK mood, mind, and marks program to support university students' mental and cognitive health through physical exercise: a qualitative study using the Behaviour Change Wheel.

Catherine E B Brown, Karyn Richardson, Bengianni Halil-Pizzirani, Sam Hughes, Lou Atkins, Rachel Perowne, Joseph Pitt, Murat Yücel, Rebecca A Segrave

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Catherine E B BrownTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Catherine.brown4@monash.edu.
Karyn RichardsonTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Bengianni Halil-PizziraniTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Sam HughesTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Lou AtkinsCentre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, UK.
Rachel PerowneCentre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, UK.
Joseph PittTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Murat Yücel *QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Rebecca A Segrave *Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConcerns about mental and cognitive health are common among university students. Engaging in regular physical exercise has been shown to enhance both mental health and cognitive performance, yet most students are not participating in the level of exercise required to obtain these benefits. The Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) provides a framework for developing behavioural interventions that are informed by theory, evidence, and stakeholder perspectives. The current study aimed to apply the BCW to develop the PEAK Mood, Mind, and Marks program (i.e., PEAK), a behaviour change intervention designed to increase university students' exercise engagement for the benefit of their mental and cognitive health.

methodsPEAK was developed across three stages of the BCW: (1) understand the target behaviour, (2) identify intervention options, and (3) identify intervention content and delivery mode. Development was informed by triangulated data from a systematic literature review, co-design consultations with key stakeholders, and knowledge of relevant experts. Consultations with stakeholders involved focus groups with 25 university students and individual interviews with 10 university leaders and staff to identify barriers and facilitators to students' exercise engagement and the adoption and implementation of PEAK by universities. Template analysis was used to code transcripts to the capability, opportunity, and motivation (COM-B) model of behaviour. The BCW was applied to identify the most appropriate intervention types and behaviour change techniques (BCTs).

resultsThirty-one barriers and facilitators were identified and mapped to seven intervention types (Education; Modelling; Persuasion; Environmental Restructuring; Incentivisation; Training; and Enablement) and 26 BCTs, which were delivered across digital channels and in-person. The final intervention consisted of multiple components targeting students' capability (e.g., increasing knowledge about the mental and cognitive health benefits of exercise), opportunity (e.g., providing a flexible range of accessible exercise options and social support), and motivation (e.g., increasing the perceived importance of exercise) to exercise.

conclusionsUniversity students and staff describe a need and appetite for more empowering, scalable solutions to support students' mental and cognitive health. Exercise-based approaches that are informed by behaviour change frameworks, evidence, and stakeholder perspectives, such as PEAK, have the potential to address this need. Current findings will inform a pilot of PEAK to evaluate its efficacy and implementation.

Indexed as

ExerciseQualitative ResearchStudentsAdolescentAdultCognitionFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PromotionHumansMaleMental HealthProgram DevelopmentUniversitiesYoung AdultBehavioural interventionBehaviour change wheelCo-designCognitive healthCOM-BMental healthPhysical exerciseUniversity students

Identifiers

PMID39039474
PMCPMC11265317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.