ArticleBMC gastroenterology2024
Amyloid A and lactic acid as a predictor in patients with sepsis in patients with liver cirrhosis.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk factors for sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Liver as a key organ for systemic antimicrobial defense.Hepatology communications · 2025Review
- Lactate-to-glucose ratio and short-term all-cause mortality in critically ill cirrhosis patients: a MIMIC-IV and eICU-CRD database study.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSepsis is triggered by pathogenic microorganisms, resulting in a systemic inflammatory response. Liver cirrhosis and sepsis create a vicious cycle: cirrhosis weakens immune function, raising infection risk and hindering pathogen clearance. Optimal treatment outcomes depend on understanding liver cirrhosis patients' sepsis risk factors. Thus, preventing sepsis involves addressing these risk factors. Therefore, early identification and understanding of clinical characteristics in liver cirrhosis patients with sepsis are crucial for selecting appropriate antibiotics. A case-control study using logistic regression was conducted to examine the prognostic value of amyloid A/lactate level monitoring in identifying sepsis risk factors in liver cirrhosis patients.
methodsFrom March 2020 to March 2022, 136 liver cirrhosis patients treated at our hospital were divided into a sepsis group (n = 35) and a non-sepsis group (n = 101) based on sepsis complications. General clinical data were collected. Univariate analysis screened for liver cirrhosis patients' sepsis risk factors. Multivariate logistic analysis was subsequently employed to evaluate the risk factors. Sepsis patients were followed up for a month. Based on prognosis, patients were categorized into a poor prognosis group (n = 16) and a good prognosis group (n = 19). Serum amyloid A (SAA) and blood lactic acid (BLA) levels were compared between the two groups. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the prognostic value of both individual and combined SAA/BLA monitoring.
resultsPatient data, including age, diabetes history, liver cancer, hepatic artery embolization, recent antibiotic use, invasive procedures within two weeks, APACHE II Scoring, ALB and SAA and BLA levels, were compared between the sepsis and non-sepsis groups, showing significant differences (P < 0.05). Logistic regression identified factors such as age ≥ 70, recent antibiotic use, recent invasive procedures, history of liver cancer, hepatic artery embolization history, high APACHE II scores, decreased albumin, and elevated SAA and BLA levels as independent sepsis risk factors in liver cirrhosis patients (P < 0.05). Among the 35 sepsis patients, 16 had a poor prognosis, representing an incidence rate of 45.71%. Serum SAA and BLA levels were significantly higher in the poor prognosis group than in the good prognosis group (P < 0.05). The AUC for serum SAA and BLA was 0.831 (95%CI: 0.738-0.924), 0.720 (95%CI: 0.600-0.840), and 0.909 (95%CI: 0.847-0.972), respectively. The combined diagnostic AUC was significantly higher than that of single factor predictions (P < 0.05). The predictive value ranked as follows: joint detection > SAA > BLA.
conclusionIn treating liver cirrhosis, prioritize patients with advanced age, a history of hepatic artery embolization, recent invasive operations, history of liver cancer, recent antibiotic exposure, high APACHE II scores and low albumin. Closely monitoring serum SAA and BLA levels in these patients can offer valuable insights for early clinical prevention and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.