ArticleSpine deformity2024
Deep learning classification of pediatric spinal radiographs for use in large scale imaging registries.
Article in Spine deformity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in early onset scoliosis: a scoping review.Spine deformity · 2026Article
- AI in Pediatric Spine Care: Clinical, Research, and Ethical Considerations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Orthopedics: A Comprehensive Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Rates of School Absences in Pediatric Scoliosis Patients and Work Absences in Their Parents/Caregivers: A Retrospective Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Predicting Nonidiopathic Scoliosis from Plain Radiographs: A Deep-Learning Approach.JB & JS open accessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study is to develop and apply an algorithm that automatically classifies spine radiographs of pediatric scoliosis patients.
methodsAnterior-posterior (AP) and lateral spine radiographs were extracted from the institutional picture archive for patients with scoliosis. Overall, there were 7777 AP images and 5621 lateral images. Radiographs were manually classified into ten categories: two preoperative and three postoperative categories each for AP and lateral images. The images were split into training, validation, and testing sets (70:15:15 proportional split). A deep learning classifier using the EfficientNet B6 architecture was trained on the spine training set. Hyperparameters and model architecture were tuned against the performance of the models in the validation set.
resultsThe trained classifiers had an overall accuracy on the test set of 1.00 on 1166 AP images and 1.00 on 843 lateral images. Precision ranged from 0.98 to 1.00 in the AP images, and from 0.91 to 1.00 on the lateral images. Lower performance was observed on classes with fewer than 100 images in the dataset. Final performance metrics were calculated on the assigned test set, including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score (the harmonic mean of precision and recall).
conclusionsA deep learning convolutional neural network classifier was trained to a high degree of accuracy to distinguish between 10 categories pre- and postoperative spine radiographs of patients with scoliosis. Observed performance was higher in more prevalent categories. These models represent an important step in developing an automatic system for data ingestion into large, labeled imaging registries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39039392What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.