Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39039354›Full record

Trial reportClinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society2024

Influence of a 2-week transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on memory: findings from a randomized placebo controlled trial in non-clinical adults.

Veronika Cibulcova, Julian Koenig, Marta Jackowska, Vera Kr Jandackova

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Midlife heart rate variability and cognitive decline: A large longitudinal cohort study.International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Veronika CibulcovaDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Syllabova 19, Ostrava, 703 00, Czech Republic. Veronika.Cibulcova@osu.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9468-0195
Julian KoenigDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1009-9625
Marta JackowskaFaculty of Psychology, SWPS University, Sopot, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2930-0483
Vera Kr JandackovaDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Syllabova 19, Ostrava, 703 00, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0892-3657

Funding

Grantová Agentura České Republiky GACR17-22346YOperational program Research, development and education CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000798Student Grant Award SGS07/LF/2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMemory plays an essential role in daily life and is one of the first functions to deteriorate in cognitive impairment and dementia. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) is a promising therapeutic method; however, its ability to enhance memory is underexplored, especially considering long-term stimulation. We aimed to investigate the effect of a 2-week course of auricular tVNS (taVNS) on memory in a non-clinical population.

methodsThis single-blind randomized placebo-wait-list controlled trial recruited 76 participants (30 men; mean age 48.32 years) and randomized them into four groups: early active/sham taVNS and late active/sham taVNS. Participation in the study lasted 4 weeks; early groups underwent 2 weeks intervention immediately following the first study site visit (days 0-13) and late groups 2 weeks after the first study site visit (days 14-27). Active and sham taVNS included 2 weeks of daily 4-h neurostimulation at the tragus or earlobe, respectively. To assess memory, we used the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test.

resultsTwo weeks of active taVNS, but not sham taVNS, improved immediate recall and short-term memory score both in early and late groups. Furthermore, the improvements persisted over subsequent follow-up in early active taVNS. Importantly, the effect of active taVNS was superior to sham for immediate recall in both early and late groups. There were no statistical differences in delayed recall.

conclusionOur findings suggest that taVNS has potential to improve memory, particularly immediate recall, and may be an effective method in preventing memory loss and mitigating cognitive aging.

Indexed as

MemoryTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationVagus Nerve StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSingle-Blind MethodImmediate recallMemoryMemory modulationTranscutaneous vagus nerve stimulationVagus nerve

Identifiers

PMID39039354
PMCPMC11732881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.