Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39039294›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2024

New persistent opioid use following robotic-assisted, laparoscopic and open surgery inguinal hernia repair.

Ian T MacQueen, Gediwon Milky, I-Fan Shih, Feibi Zheng, David C Chen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Short-Term Outcomes and Cost of Robotic Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy During the Initial Phase of a Robotic Pancreatectomy Program.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The effect of surgical approach on opioid prescription rates for outpatient ventral hernia repair.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ian T MacQueenDepartment of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Gediwon MilkyGlobal Access, Value & Economics, Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA.
I-Fan ShihGlobal Access, Value & Economics, Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA.
Feibi ZhengGlobal Access, Value & Economics, Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA.
David C ChenDepartment of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. dcchen@mednet.ucla.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0517-9973

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPost-operative prescription opioid use is a known risk factor for persistent opioid use. Despite the increased utilization of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) for inguinal hernia repair (IHR), little is known whether this minimally invasive approach results in less opioid consumption. In this study, we compare long-term opioid use between RAS versus laparoscopic (Lap) versus open surgery for IHR.

methodsA retrospective cohort study of opioid-naïve patients who underwent outpatient primary IHR was conducted using the Merative™ MarketScan® (Previously IBM MarketScan®) Databases between 2016 and 2020. Patients not continuously enrolled 180 days before/after surgery, who had malignancy, pre-existing chronic pain, opioid dependency, or invalid prescription fill information were excluded. Among patients exposed to opioids peri-operatively, we assessed long-term opioid use as any opioid prescription fill within 90 to 180 days post-surgery. Secondary outcomes were controlled substance schedule II/III opioid fill, and high-dose opioid fill defined as > 50 morphine milligram equivalent per day. An Inverse-probability of treatment weighted logistic regression was used to compare outcomes between groups with p-value of < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

resultsA total of 41,271 patients were identified (2070 (5.0%) RAS, 16,704 (40.5%) Lap, and 22,497 (54.5%) open surgery). RAS was associated with less likelihood of prescription fills for any opioid (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.98 versus Lap; OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.85 versus open), and schedule II/III opioid (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.96 versus Lap; OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.88 versus open), but comparable high-dose opioid fill (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.55 versus Lap; OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.52 versus open). Lap and open surgery had no significant difference.

conclusionIn this cohort of patients derived from a national commercial claims dataset, patients undergoing RAS had a decreased risk of long-term opioid use compared to laparoscopic and open surgery patients undergoing IHR.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidHernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyLaparoscopyPostoperative PainRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOpioid-Related DisordersRetrospective StudiesAnalgesics, OpioidInguinal hernia repairMinimally invasive surgeryPersistent opioid useRobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID39039294
PMCPMC11362387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.