SynthesisPsychopharmacology2025
Efficacy of ginsenoside Rg1 on rodent models of depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Psychopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Ginsenoside Rg1 triggers ferroptosis to inhibit hepatocellular carcinoma via SLC7A11 downregulation.Discover oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleDepression is a prevalent psychiatric disease, and ginsenoside Rg1 is a bioactive compound extracted from the root of Panax ginseng C.A.Mey. To systematically investigate the effectiveness of Rg1 in rodent models of depression and provide evidence-based references for treating depression.
methodsElectronic searches for rodent studies were performed from inception to October 2022, e.g., PUBMED and EMBASE. Data extraction and quality evaluation were performed for the references, and meta-analysis was performed on the selected data using Review Manager 5.3.5. The outcomes were analyzed via a random-effect model and presented as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
resultsA total of 24 studies and 678 animals were included in this meta-analysis. Rg1 remarkably improved depressive-like symptoms of depressed rodents, including the sucrose preference test (25.08, 95% CI: 20.17-30.00, Z = 10.01, P < 0.00001), forced swimming test (MD = -37.69, 95% CI: (-45.18, -30.2); Z = 9.86, P < 0.00001), and the tail suspension test (MD = -22.93, seconds, 95% CI: (-38.49, -7.37); Z = 2.89, P = 0.004).
conclusionsThe main antidepressant mechanism of Rg1 was concluded to be the neurotransmitter system, oxidant stress system, and inflammation. Conclusively, this study indicated the possible protective and therapeutic effects of Rg1 for treating depression via multiple mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39039242What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.