Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39039209›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2024

Modeling body size information within weight labels using probability distributions.

Thomas Chazelle, Michel Guerraz, Richard Palluel-Germain

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas ChazelleUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LPNC, 38000, Grenoble, France.
Michel GuerrazUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LPNC, 38000, Grenoble, France.
Richard Palluel-GermainUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LPNC, 38000, Grenoble, France. richard.palluel@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What images of bodies do we associate with thinness and fatness? Can our representations of weight-related words be described by simple probability distributions? To answer these questions, the present study examined participants' perceptions of a set of weight-related words using a pictural scale. 259 French women indicated the thinnest, fattest, and best-fitting figures for 13 words. We then used their responses to construct PERT probability distributions, simple skewed distributions allowing to visualize what body sizes were associated with each word. In particular, the variability of the distributions showed how different weight labels can have more or less precise meanings. We found some evidence that the lowest body mass index associated with a label shifted towards thinner figures as body dissatisfaction increased. Using the same method, we investigated the boundaries of what participants consider the ideal body, and showed that the inclusion of their own body in these boundaries predicted their levels of body dissatisfaction. We argue that PERT distributions can be a useful, easy-to-use tool in body image research for modeling the representations of weight labels in different populations.

Indexed as

Body ImageBody SizeAdolescentAdultBody DissatisfactionBody Mass IndexBody WeightFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProbabilityThinnessYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.