ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2024
The ballistic articular structure injury classification (BASIC) system: clarifying ballistic articular injuries.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to (1) devise a classification system to categorize and manage ballistic fractures of the knee, hip, and shoulder; (2) assess the reliability of this classification compared to current classification schemas; and (3) determine the association of this classification with surgical management.
methodsWe performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected trauma database at an urban level 1 trauma centre. The study included 147 patients with 169 articular fractures caused by ballistic trauma to the knee, hip, and shoulder. Injuries were selected based on radiographic criteria from plain radiographs and CT scans. The AO/OTA classification system's reliability was compared to that of the novel ballistic articular injury classification system (BASIC), developed using a nominal group approach. The BASIC system's ability to guide surgical decision-making, aiming to achieve stable fixation and minimize post-traumatic arthritis, was also evaluated.
resultsThe BASIC system was created after analysing 73 knee, 62 hip, and 34 shoulder fractures. CT scans were used in 88% of cases, with 44% of patients receiving surgery. The BASIC classification comprises five subgroups, with a plus sign indicating the need for soft tissue intervention. Interrater reliability showed fair agreement for AO/OTA (k = 0.373) and moderate agreement for BASIC (k = 0.444). The BASIC system correlated strongly with surgical decisions, with an 83% concurrence in treatment choices based on chart reviews.
conclusionsConventional classification systems provide limited guidance for ballistic articular injuries. The BASIC system offers a pragmatic and reproducible alternative, with potential to inform treatment decisions for knee, hip, and shoulder ballistic injuries. Further research is needed to validate this system and its correlation with patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Diagnostic Study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39039172What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.