ArticleScientific reports2024
Iatrogenic transmission of Trypanosoma evansi infection in camels and its consequences.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mesolens imaging in microbiology.Essays in biochemistry · 2026Review
- Vector-borne diseases-knowledge maps.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trypanosoma evansi infection has started to become a wide spread phenomena around the camel-rearing areas of North Africa and the Middle East. The disease caused by trypanosomes is locally known as "Surra" and it can seriously impact not only the health of domestic animals but the local economy as well. After taking over the management of a farm containing approximately 700 camels, it was found that a large number were suffering from trypanosome infection and it was of the utmost importance to find the source of this infection. An extensive dive into the records and observations were initially made to identify the infected population. Under closer inspection it was found that the infection was limited mostly to female individuals that had undergone extended reproductive analysis or treatment. Blood samples were taken from each of the individuals for buffy coat test and blood smears. Among the total number of tested camels (n = 590), almost 40% were infected with trypanosomes. The number and percentage of infection correlate with the number of fertility and pregnancy treatments that the camels had undergone. The most severely infected group, underwent between 17 and 20 instances of treatment or tests, had an infection rate of almost 90%. The devastating effect of trypanosomiasis on camel pregnancy and birth were also verified with 61% of all abortions and 82% of all neonatal deaths coming from trypanosome infected individuals. These results clearly demonstrate how damaging iatrogenic infections of T. evansi can be and how simply they could have been prevented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.