Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39039117›Full record

ArticleHeredity2024

Multiple karyotype differences between populations of the Hoplias malabaricus (Teleostei; Characiformes), a species complex in the gray area of the speciation process.

Fernando H S Souza, Manolo F Perez, Pedro H N Ferreira, Luiz A C Bertollo, Tariq Ezaz, Deborah Charlesworth, Marcelo B Cioffi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Repeatome Dynamics and Sex Chromosome Differentiation in the XY and XYInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fernando H S Souza *Laboratory of Evolutionary Cytogenetics, Department of Genetics and Evolution, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6209-6296
Manolo F Perez *Laboratory of Evolutionary Cytogenetics, Department of Genetics and Evolution, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4642-7793
Pedro H N FerreiraLaboratory of Evolutionary Cytogenetics, Department of Genetics and Evolution, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4483-7489
Luiz A C BertolloLaboratory of Evolutionary Cytogenetics, Department of Genetics and Evolution, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Tariq EzazInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4763-1347
Deborah CharlesworthInstitute for Evolutionary Biology, Ashworth Laboratories, King's Buildings, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3939-9122
Marcelo B CioffiLaboratory of Evolutionary Cytogenetics, Department of Genetics and Evolution, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil. mbcioffi@ufscar.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neotropical fishes exhibit remarkable karyotype diversity, whose evolution is poorly understood. Here, we studied genetic differences in 60 individuals, from 11 localities of one species, the wolf fish Hoplias malabaricus, from populations that include six different "karyomorphs". These differ in Y-X chromosome differentiation, and, in several cases, by fusions with autosomes that have resulted in multiple sex chromosomes. Other differences are also observed in diploid chromosome numbers and morphologies. In an attempt to start understanding how this diversity was generated, we analyzed within- and between-population differences in a genome-wide sequence data set. We detect clear genotype differences between karyomorphs. Even in sympatry, samples with different karyomorphs differ more in sequence than samples from allopatric populations of the same karyomorph, suggesting that they represent populations that are to some degree reproductively isolated. However, sequence divergence between populations with different karyomorphs is remarkably low, suggesting that chromosome rearrangements may have evolved during a brief evolutionary time. We suggest that the karyotypic differences probably evolved in allopatry, in small populations that would have allowed rapid fixation of rearrangements, and that they became sympatric after their differentiation. Further studies are needed to test whether the karyotype differences contribute to reproductive isolation detected between some H. malabaricus karyomorphs.

Indexed as

CharaciformesGenetic SpeciationKaryotypeAnimalsFemaleGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationKaryotypingMaleSex ChromosomesSympatry

Identifiers

PMID39039117
PMCPMC11437160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.