ArticleScientific reports2024
A two-tier feature selection method for predicting mortality risk in ICU patients with acute kidney injury.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable machine learning for predicting mechanical ventilation in Alzheimer's patients with pneumonia: a SHAP-guided XGBoost nomogram based on MIMIC-IV.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development of the Neutrophil-to-Platelet Ratio (NPR) Integrated with Machine Learning for Predicting Early Mortality After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most important lethal factors for patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs), and timely high-risk prognostic assessment and intervention are essential to improving patient prognosis. In this study, a stacking model using the MIMIC-III dataset with a two-tier feature selection approach was developed to predict the risk of in-hospital mortality in ICU patients admitted for AKI. External validation was performed using separate MIMIC-IV and eICU-CRD. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated using the stacking model, and features were selected using the Boruta and XGBoost feature selection methods. This study compares the performance of a stacking model using two-tier feature selection with a model using single-tier feature selection (XGBoost: 85; Boruta: 83; two-tier: 0.91). The predictive effectiveness of the stacking model was further validated by using different datasets (Validation 1: 0.83; Validation 2: 0.85) and comparing it with a simpler model and traditional clinical scores (SOFA: 0.65; APACH IV: 0.61). In addition, this study combined interpretable techniques and causal inference to analyze the causal relationship between features and predicted outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.