Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39039099›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Impact of MRI radiomic feature normalization for prognostic modelling in uterine endometrial and cervical cancers.

Erlend Hodneland, Erling Andersen, Kari S Wagner-Larsen, Julie A Dybvik, Njål Lura, Kristine E Fasmer, Mari K Halle, Camilla Krakstad, Ingfrid Haldorsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Predicting aggressive disease and poor outcome in endometrial cancer using preoperative [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Erlend HodnelandMMIV Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre, Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies Vei 65, 5021, Bergen, Norway. erlend.hodneland@helse-bergen.no.
Erling AndersenDepartment of Clinical Engineering, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Kari S Wagner-LarsenMMIV Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre, Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies Vei 65, 5021, Bergen, Norway.
Julie A DybvikMMIV Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre, Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies Vei 65, 5021, Bergen, Norway.
Njål LuraMMIV Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre, Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies Vei 65, 5021, Bergen, Norway.
Kristine E FasmerMMIV Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre, Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies Vei 65, 5021, Bergen, Norway.
Mari K HalleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Camilla KrakstadDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Ingfrid HaldorsenMMIV Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre, Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies Vei 65, 5021, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 461136The Western Norway Regional Health Authority 461120Trond Mohn stiftelse BFS2016TMT01Trond Mohn stiftelse BFS2018TMT06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Widespread clinical use of MRI radiomic tumor profiling for prognostication and treatment planning in cancers faces major obstacles due to limitations in standardization of radiomic features. The purpose of the current work was to assess the impact of different MRI scanning- and normalization protocols for the statistical analyses of tumor radiomic data in two patient cohorts with uterine endometrial-(EC) (n = 136) and cervical (CC) (n = 132) cancer. 1.5 T and 3 T, T1-weighted MRI 2 min post-contrast injection, T2-weighted turbo spin echo imaging, and diffusion-weighted imaging were acquired. Radiomic features were extracted from within manually segmented tumors in 3D and normalized either using z-score normalization or a linear regression model (LRM) accounting for linear dependencies with MRI acquisition parameters. Patients were clustered into two groups based on radiomic profile. Impact of MRI scanning parameters on cluster composition and prognostication were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis tests, Kaplan-Meier plots, log-rank test, random survival forests and LASSO Cox regression with time-dependent area under curve (tdAUC) (α = 0.05). A large proportion of the radiomic features was statistically associated with MRI scanning protocol in both cohorts (EC: 162/385 [42%]; CC: 180/292 [62%]). A substantial number of EC (49/136 [36%]) and CC (50/132 [38%]) patients changed cluster when clustering was performed after z-score-versus LRM normalization. Prognostic modeling based on cluster groups yielded similar outputs for the two normalization methods in the EC/CC cohorts (log-rank test; z-score: p = 0.02/0.33; LRM: p = 0.01/0.45). Mean tdAUC for prognostic modeling of disease-specific survival (DSS) by the radiomic features in EC/CC was similar for the two normalization methods (random survival forests; z-score: mean tdAUC = 0.77/0.78; LRM: mean tdAUC = 0.80/0.75; LASSO Cox; z-score: mean tdAUC = 0.64/0.76; LRM: mean tdAUC = 0.76/0.75). Severe biases in tumor radiomics data due to MRI scanning parameters exist. Z-score normalization does not eliminate these biases, whereas LRM normalization effectively does. Still, radiomic cluster groups after z-score- and LRM normalization were similarly associated with DSS in EC and CC patients.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisRadiomicsCervical cancerEndometrial cancerMRINormalizationRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID39039099
PMCPMC11263557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.