Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39039051›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Chemical language modeling with structured state space sequence models.

Rıza Özçelik, Sarah de Ruiter, Emanuele Criscuolo, Francesca Grisoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Test-Time Training Scaling Laws for Chemical Exploration in Drug Design.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Generative Deep Learning for de Novo Drug Design─A Chemical Space Odyssey.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rıza ÖzçelikInstitute for Complex Molecular Systems and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4052-9721
Sarah de RuiterInstitute for Complex Molecular Systems and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Emanuele CriscuoloInstitute for Complex Molecular Systems and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Francesca GrisoniInstitute for Complex Molecular Systems and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. f.grisoni@tue.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-8552-6615

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) ERC, ReMINDER, 101077879Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research) EINF-5406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generative deep learning is reshaping drug design. Chemical language models (CLMs) - which generate molecules in the form of molecular strings - bear particular promise for this endeavor. Here, we introduce a recent deep learning architecture, termed Structured State Space Sequence (S4) model, into de novo drug design. In addition to its unprecedented performance in various fields, S4 has shown remarkable capabilities to learn the global properties of sequences. This aspect is intriguing in chemical language modeling, where complex molecular properties like bioactivity can 'emerge' from separated portions in the molecular string. This observation gives rise to the following question: Can S4 advance chemical language modeling for de novo design? To provide an answer, we systematically benchmark S4 with state-of-the-art CLMs on an array of drug discovery tasks, such as the identification of bioactive compounds, and the design of drug-like molecules and natural products. S4 shows a superior capacity to learn complex molecular properties, while at the same time exploring diverse scaffolds. Finally, when applied prospectively to kinase inhibition, S4 designs eight of out ten molecules that are predicted as highly active by molecular dynamics simulations. Taken together, these findings advocate for the introduction of S4 into chemical language modeling - uncovering its untapped potential in the molecular sciences.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationBiological ProductsDeep LearningDrug DesignDrug DiscoveryModels, ChemicalBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID39039051
PMCPMC11263548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.