Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39038970›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine

What Are Doctors For? A Call for Compassion-Based Metrics as a Measure of Physician Value.

Timothy Aaron Zeller, Parker A Rhoden, Catherine Florio Pipas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Timothy Aaron ZellerClemson Rural Health, Clemson, South Carolina timmyzeller@gmail.com.
Parker A RhodenMedical University of South Carolina Health, Charleston, South Carolina.
Catherine Florio PipasCommunity & Family Medicine, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern measures of physician value are couched in terms of productivity, volume, finance, outcomes, cure rates, and acquisition of an increasingly vast knowledge base. This inherently feeds burnout and imposter syndrome as physicians experience an inability to measure up to unrealistic standards set externally and perceived internally. Ancient and modern wisdom suggests that where populations fail to flourish, at root is a failure to grasp a vision or true purpose. Traditional philosophical conceptions of a physician's purpose center around compassion, empathy, and humanism, which are a key to thwarting burnout and recovering professional satisfaction. New compassion-based metrics are urgently needed and will positively impact physician well-being and improve population health.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalEmpathyPhysiciansHumanismHumansJob SatisfactionPhysician-Patient Relationsburnoutempathyimposter syndromejoy in practiceperformance metricsphysician wellbeingpurpose

Identifiers

PMID39038970
PMCPMC11268686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.