ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
A large-scale assessment of sequence database search tools for homology-based protein function prediction.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- From hidden allies to precision symbionts: unleashing endophytes for sustainable agroecosystems.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- AI-driven discovery in protein science for immunology and infectious disease research.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Gene Surfing: An efficient and versatile tool for targeted enzyme mining in metagenomics.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025Article
- EZpred: improving deep learning-based enzyme function prediction using unlabeled sequence homologs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The 2024 Report on the Human Proteome from the HUPO Human Proteome Project.Journal of proteome research · 2024Review
- InterLabelGO+: unraveling label correlations in protein function prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sequence database searches followed by homology-based function transfer form one of the oldest and most popular approaches for predicting protein functions, such as Gene Ontology (GO) terms. These searches are also a critical component in most state-of-the-art machine learning and deep learning-based protein function predictors. Although sequence search tools are the basis of homology-based protein function prediction, previous studies have scarcely explored how to select the optimal sequence search tools and configure their parameters to achieve the best function prediction. In this paper, we evaluate the effect of using different options from among popular search tools, as well as the impacts of search parameters, on protein function prediction. When predicting GO terms on a large benchmark dataset, we found that BLASTp and MMseqs2 consistently exceed the performance of other tools, including DIAMOND-one of the most popular tools for function prediction-under default search parameters. However, with the correct parameter settings, DIAMOND can perform comparably to BLASTp and MMseqs2 in function prediction. Additionally, we developed a new scoring function to derive GO prediction from homologous hits that consistently outperform previously proposed scoring functions. These findings enable the improvement of almost all protein function prediction algorithms with a few easily implementable changes in their sequence homolog-based component. This study emphasizes the critical role of search parameter settings in homology-based function transfer and should have an important contribution to the development of future protein function prediction algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.