ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
MiRAGE: mining relationships for advanced generative evaluation in drug repositioning.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Laboratory to Patient Access: A Scoping Review of the Multi-Dimensional Challenges in Drug Repurposing.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- GiGs: graph-based integrated Gaussian kernel similarity for virus-drug association prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Relational similarity-based graph contrastive learning for DTI prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- PSO-FeatureFusion: a general framework for fusing heterogeneous features via particle swarm optimization.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Model ensembling as a tool to form interpretable multi-omic predictors of cancer pharmacosensitivity.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationDrug repositioning, the identification of new therapeutic uses for existing drugs, is crucial for accelerating drug discovery and reducing development costs. Some methods rely on heterogeneous networks, which may not fully capture the complex relationships between drugs and diseases. However, integrating diverse biological data sources offers promise for discovering new drug-disease associations (DDAs). Previous evidence indicates that the combination of information would be conducive to the discovery of new DDAs. However, the challenge lies in effectively integrating different biological data sources to identify the most effective drugs for a certain disease based on drug-disease coupled mechanisms.
resultsIn response to this challenge, we present MiRAGE, a novel computational method for drug repositioning. MiRAGE leverages a three-step framework, comprising negative sampling using hard negative mining, classification employing random forest models, and feature selection based on feature importance. We evaluate MiRAGE on multiple benchmark datasets, demonstrating its superiority over state-of-the-art algorithms across various metrics. Notably, MiRAGE consistently outperforms other methods in uncovering novel DDAs. Case studies focusing on Parkinson's disease and schizophrenia showcase MiRAGE's ability to identify top candidate drugs supported by previous studies. Overall, our study underscores MiRAGE's efficacy and versatility as a computational tool for drug repositioning, offering valuable insights for therapeutic discoveries and addressing unmet medical needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.