Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39038795›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

Lingdan: enhancing encoding of traditional Chinese medicine knowledge for clinical reasoning tasks with large language models.

Rui Hua, Xin Dong, Yu Wei, Zixin Shu, Pengcheng Yang, Yunhui Hu, Shuiping Zhou, He Sun, Kaijing Yan, Xijun Yan and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. A review of recent artificial intelligence for traditional medicine.Journal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Rui HuaInstitute of Medical Intelligence, Beijing Key Lab of Traffic Data Analysis and Mining, School of Computer Science & Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China.ORCID 0009-0001-6510-4367
Xin DongInstitute of Medical Intelligence, Beijing Key Lab of Traffic Data Analysis and Mining, School of Computer Science & Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1414-9354
Yu WeiInnovation Center of Digital & Intelligent Chinese Medicine, Tasly Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300410, China.
Zixin ShuInstitute of Medical Intelligence, Beijing Key Lab of Traffic Data Analysis and Mining, School of Computer Science & Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China.
Pengcheng YangInnovation Center of Digital & Intelligent Chinese Medicine, Tasly Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300410, China.
Yunhui HuInnovation Center of Digital & Intelligent Chinese Medicine, Tasly Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300410, China.
Shuiping ZhouInnovation Center of Digital & Intelligent Chinese Medicine, Tasly Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300410, China.
He SunInnovation Center of Digital & Intelligent Chinese Medicine, Tasly Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300410, China.
Kaijing YanInnovation Center of Digital & Intelligent Chinese Medicine, Tasly Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300410, China.
Xijun YanInnovation Center of Digital & Intelligent Chinese Medicine, Tasly Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300410, China.
Kai ChangInstitute of Medical Intelligence, Beijing Key Lab of Traffic Data Analysis and Mining, School of Computer Science & Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China.
Xiaodong LiAffiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430065, China.
Yuning BaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China.
Runshun ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China.
Wenjia WangInnovation Center of Digital & Intelligent Chinese Medicine, Tasly Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300410, China.
Xuezhong ZhouInstitute of Medical Intelligence, Beijing Key Lab of Traffic Data Analysis and Mining, School of Computer Science & Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China.

Funding

Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Basic Research Cooperation 22JCZXJC00070Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Basic Research Cooperation Project 22JCZXJC00070Key R&D Program Project of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region 2022BEG02036National Key Research and Development Program 2023YFC3502604National Natural Science Foundation of China 82374302Natural Science Foundation of Beijing L232033Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen SZZYSM202311002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe recent surge in large language models (LLMs) across various fields has yet to be fully realized in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). This study aims to bridge this gap by developing a large language model tailored to TCM knowledge, enhancing its performance and accuracy in clinical reasoning tasks such as diagnosis, treatment, and prescription recommendations. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study harnessed a wide array of TCM data resources, including TCM ancient books, textbooks, and clinical data, to create 3 key datasets: the TCM Pre-trained Dataset, the Traditional Chinese Patent Medicine (TCPM) Question Answering Dataset, and the Spleen and Stomach Herbal Prescription Recommendation Dataset. These datasets underpinned the development of the Lingdan Pre-trained LLM and 2 specialized models: the Lingdan-TCPM-Chat Model, which uses a Chain-of-Thought process for symptom analysis and TCPM recommendation, and a Lingdan Prescription Recommendation model (Lingdan-PR) that proposes herbal prescriptions based on electronic medical records.

resultsThe Lingdan-TCPM-Chat and the Lingdan-PR Model, fine-tuned on the Lingdan Pre-trained LLM, demonstrated state-of-the art performances for the tasks of TCM clinical knowledge answering and herbal prescription recommendation. Notably, Lingdan-PR outperformed all state-of-the-art baseline models, achieving an improvement of 18.39% in the Top@20 F1-score compared with the best baseline.

conclusionThis study marks a pivotal step in merging advanced LLMs with TCM, showcasing the potential of artificial intelligence to help improve clinical decision-making of medical diagnostics and treatment strategies. The success of the Lingdan Pre-trained LLM and its derivative models, Lingdan-TCPM-Chat and Lingdan-PR, not only revolutionizes TCM practices but also opens new avenues for the application of artificial intelligence in other specialized medical fields. Our project is available at https://github.com/TCMAI-BJTU/LingdanLLM.

Indexed as

Clinical ReasoningMedicine, Chinese TraditionalDatasets as TopicDrugs, Chinese HerbalElectronic Health RecordsHumansNatural Language ProcessingDrugs, Chinese Herbalclinical reasoninglarge language modelprescription recommendationpre-trainingtraditional Chinese medicine

Identifiers

PMID39038795
PMCPMC11339528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.