Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39038282›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

Initial Perspectives From Rural-Residing Adults on a Digital Cognitive Health Coaching Intervention: Exploratory Qualitative Analysis.

Jennifer Rae Myers, Kelsey N Bryk, Erica N Madero, Jacob McFarlane, Anthony Campitelli, Joshua Gills, Megan Jones, Sally Paulson, Michelle Gray, Jordan M Glenn

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04559789 (Digital Cognitive Multidomain Alzheimer's Risk Velocity Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04559789 naunknown statusnot on this map

Digital Cognitive Multidomain Alzheimer's Risk Velocity Study (DC-MARVEL)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNeurotrack Technologies, Inc.Ran2021 to 2024Enrolled200ConditionsAlzheimer Disease, Dementia, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Cognitive DeclineArmsMindMate + Health Coaching, Health Education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jennifer Rae MyersNeurotrack Technologies, Redwood City, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1754-3784
Kelsey N BrykNeurotrack Technologies, Redwood City, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3926-230X
Erica N MaderoNeurotrack Technologies, Redwood City, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5112-2441
Jacob McFarlaneNeurotrack Technologies, Redwood City, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5515-4646
Anthony CampitelliExercise Science Research Center, Department of Health, Human Performance and Recreation, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9191-9263
Joshua GillsExercise Science Research Center, Department of Health, Human Performance and Recreation, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3321-4120
Megan JonesExercise Science Research Center, Department of Health, Human Performance and Recreation, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1023-310X
Sally PaulsonSt. Elizabeth Healthcare Clinical Research Institute, Edgewood, KY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8411-5259
Michelle GrayExercise Science Research Center, Department of Health, Human Performance and Recreation, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5721-9087
Jordan M GlennNeurotrack Technologies, Redwood City, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2563-4291

Funding

Digital multidomain lifestyle intervention to address cognitive health and modifiable risk factors for Alzheimer's diseaseR44AG063672 · NIA · NEUROTRACK TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · PI GLENN, JORDAN · 2019 to 2022
$3.3M
NIA NIH HHS R44 AG063672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA growing body of research has examined lifestyle-based interventions for dementia prevention. Specifically, health coaching interventions have been linked to decreased risk of Alzheimer disease (AD) comorbidities, such as diabetes. Despite the association, there is a lack of research examining the efficacy and perception of digital health coaching on reducing AD risk. Understanding the perceived benefits of participating in a digital health coach program is critical to ensure long-term use, including participant adherence and engagement.

objectiveThe purpose of this study is to examine the initial attitudes toward a digital health coaching intervention aimed at preventing cognitive decline among at-risk, rural participants.

methodsThis exploratory qualitative study is part of the ongoing Digital Cognitive Multidomain Alzheimer Risk Velocity Study (DC-MARVel; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04559789), a 2-year randomized control trial examining the effects of a digital health coaching intervention on dementia risk, cognitive decline, and general health outcomes. Participants were recruited from the northwest region of Arkansas via word of mouth, email, local radio, and social media. At the time of the analysis, 103 participants randomly assigned to the health coaching group completed an average of 4 coaching sessions over a 4-month period. The intervention included asynchronous messages 1-2 times per week from their health coach that contained health education articles based on the participant's goals (eg, increase physical activity), unlimited access to their coach for questions and recommendations, and monthly meetings with their coach via videoconference or phone to discuss their goals. Participants were asked 2 open-ended questions, "What were your top 1 or 2 takeaways from your recent Health Coaching session?" and "Is there anything you would change about our Health Coaching sessions?" A thematic analysis was conducted using feedback responses from 80 participants (mean age, SD 7.6 years).

resultsThe following four themes emerged from participants' feedback: (1) healthy lifestyle and behavioral changes, (2) a sense of self-awareness through introspection, (3) value in coach support, and (4) a desire for a change in program format (eg, frequency). In total, 93% (n=74) of participants expressed that the intervention needed no changes.

conclusionsInitial participation in the digital cognitive health coaching intervention was well received, as evidenced by participants reporting value in goal setting and strategies for healthy lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as self-reflection on their personal lifestyle choices. Feedback about their assigned coach also offers insight into the importance of the coach-participant relationship and may serve as a significant factor in overall participant success. Given the exploratory nature of this study, more robust research is needed to elicit more information from participants about their experiences to fully understand the acceptability of the digital health coaching intervention.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04559789; https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04559789. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/31841.

Indexed as

Alzheimer diseasebehavioral changecoach supportcognitioncountrysidedementiadiabetesdiabetes mellitusdigital cognitive health coachingdigital healthelderelderlygeriatricgeriatricshealth informaticshealthy lifestyleinterventionmental healthmHealthpreventionqualitative studyruralrural issuesself-awarenesstelehealththematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID39038282
PMCPMC11301112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.