ArticleThe Journal of craniofacial surgery2024
Gingivo-Periosteal Expansion of Edentulous Jaw Crest with An Osmotic Self-Inflatable Expander: A Preclinical in Vivo Study.
Article in The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hydrogel soft tissue expander for gingiva-periosteal expansion: a narrative literature review.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2026Review
- Polymers for Osmotic Self-Inflating Expanders in Oral Surgical Procedures: A Comprehensive Review.Polymers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined the biocompatibility and expansion volume of tissue expanders utilizing rabbits and beagles as experimental models. The self-inflatable expander was provided using a Tissue balloon® (Neobiotech Co., Seoul, Korea). In 9 adult rabbits, a Tissue balloon® was placed under the lateral mandibular periosteum via an extraoral approach. After 2, 3, and 4 weeks (n=3), the expanders were removed, and soft tissue and bone samples were collected for analysis. Histomorphometric analysis and measurements of expander characteristics were performed. In 5 Beagles, all premolars were extracted. Three months after extraction, tissue expanders were placed in the maxilla and mandible, adjacent to dental extraction sites, and removed after 3 weeks. Gingival parameters were measured before and after expansion. Blood perfusion in the oral mucosa was assessed using a laser Doppler flowmeter at different time points. After three weeks, dogs were euthanized, and tissue samples were collected for histologic analysis, focusing on inflammatory response, bone formation, and gingival thickness changes. In the rabbit study, measurements of size, weight, and volume showed significant increases over 4 weeks. Swelling peaked at 2 weeks postimplantation and then gradually stabilized. Histologic examination revealed no signs of inflammation, and expanders were covered by collagen-rich capsules. Some bone resorption was noted due to pressure from the expanders, but the resorption was not significant. In the beagle study, twenty tissue expanders were implanted; 1 expander was lost, and 9 wounds dehisced during soft tissue healing. However, no signs of infection were noted. Histologic evaluation showed bone atrophy, attributed to swelling pressure, at the recipient site. Gingival thickness was not decreased. Perfusion measurements indicated that expansion did not affect microvascular circulation adversely. Overall, both studies suggest that tissue expanders demonstrate biocompatibility and successful expansion volume in vivo, with minimal adverse effects on surrounding tissues and microvascular circulation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.