Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39038056›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Predicting postoperative visual acuity in epiretinal membrane patients and visualization of the contribution of explanatory variables in a machine learning model.

Akiko Irie-Ota, Yoshitsugu Matsui, Koki Imai, Yoko Mase, Keiichiro Konno, Taku Sasaki, Shinichiro Chujo, Hisashi Matsubara, Hiroharu Kawanaka, Mineo Kondo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Akiko Irie-OtaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan.ORCID 0009-0004-9807-4899
Yoshitsugu MatsuiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan.
Koki ImaiDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mie University, Tsu, Mie, Japan.
Yoko MaseDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan.
Keiichiro KonnoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan.
Taku SasakiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan.
Shinichiro ChujoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan.
Hisashi MatsubaraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan.
Hiroharu KawanakaDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mie University, Tsu, Mie, Japan.
Mineo KondoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to develop a model that can predict the postoperative visual acuity in eyes that had undergone vitrectomy for an epiretinal membrane (ERM). The Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) was used to evaluate the accuracy of the prediction and the contribution of the explanatory variables. Two models were designed to predict the postoperative visual acuity in 67 ERM patients. Model 1 used the age, sex, affected eye, axial length, preoperative visual acuity, Govetto's classification stage, and OCT-derived vector information as features to predict the visual acuity at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Model 2 incorporated the early postoperative visual acuity as an additional variable to predict the visual acuity at 3, and 6 months postoperatively. LightGBM with 100 iterations of 5-fold cross-validation was used to tune the hyperparameters and train the model. This involved addressing multicollinearity and selecting the explanatory variables. The generalized performance of these models was evaluated using the root mean squared error (RMSE) in a 5-fold cross-validation, and the contributions of the explanatory variables were visualized using the average Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values.

resultsThe RMSEs for the predicted visual acuity of Model 1 were 0.14 ± 0.02 logMAR units at 1 month, 0.12 ± 0.03 logMAR units at 3 months, and 0.13 ± 0.04 logMAR units at 6 months. High SHAP values were observed for the preoperative visual acuity and the ectopic inner foveal layer (EIFL) area with significant and positive correlations across all models. Model 2 that incorporated the postoperative visual acuity was used to predict the visual acuity at 3 and 6 months, and it had superior accuracy with RMSEs of 0.10 ± 0.02 logMAR units at 3 months and 0.10 ± 0.04 logMAR units at 6 months. High SHAP values were observed for the postoperative visual acuity in Model 2.

conclusionPredicting the postoperative visual acuity in ERM patients is possible using the preoperative clinical data and OCT images with LightGBM. The contribution of the explanatory variables can be visualized using the SHAP values, and the accuracy of the prediction models improved when the postoperative visual acuity is included as an explanatory variable. Our data-driven machine learning models reveal that preoperative visual acuity and the size of the EIFL significantly influence postoperative visual acuity. Early intervention may be crucial for achieving favorable visual outcomes in eyes with an ERM.

Indexed as

Epiretinal MembraneMachine LearningVisual AcuityVitrectomyAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID39038056
PMCPMC11262671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.