Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39038016›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Immunohistochemistry-based investigation of MYC, BCL2, and Ki-67 protein expression and their clinical impact in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in upper Northern Thailand.

Phuttirak Yimpak, Kanokkan Bumroongkit, Adisak Tantiworawit, Thanawat Rattanathammethee, Sirinda Aungsuchawan, Teerada Daroontum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. BMC medical imaging · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Clinical value of ENO2 in serum extracellular vesicles for the diagnosis and prognosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Phuttirak YimpakDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0001-8633-9798
Kanokkan BumroongkitDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Adisak TantiworawitDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2381-9292
Thanawat RattanathammetheeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-2731-4889
Sirinda AungsuchawanDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Teerada DaroontumDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-5968-218X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) that accounts for approximately 25-40% of all NHL cases. The objective of this study was to investigate the protein expression, clinical impact, and prognostic role of MYC, BCL2, and Ki-67 in Thai DLBCL patients. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 100 DLBCL patients diagnosed between January 2018 and December 2019. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess the expression of MYC, BCL2, and Ki-67. The study revealed a significant association between extranodal involvement and positive cases of MYC and BCL2. MYC expressions were associated with Ki-67 expression, while BCL2 positivity was associated with the non-germinal center B-cell (non-GCB) subtype. However, there were no significant differences in the three-year overall survival (OS) and three-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates when using cut-off points of ≥ 40% for MYC, ≥ 50% for BCL2, and ≥ 70% for Ki-67. Notably, DLBCL cases with co-expression of MYC and BCL2 exhibited significantly inferior three-year OS compared to other cases (0% vs. 53%; p = 0.020). Multivariate analysis identified age ≥ 60 years and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status as independent prognostic factors. In conclusion, MYC, BCL2, and Ki-67 expression can serve as prognostic biomarkers; however, their prognostic value may vary based on the specific cut-off values used. Therefore, determining the appropriate threshold for each biomarker based on individual laboratory analyses and clinical outcomes is crucial.

Indexed as

ImmunohistochemistryKi-67 AntigenLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesThailandBCL2 protein, humanBiomarkers, TumorKi-67 AntigenMYC protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc

Identifiers

PMID39038016
PMCPMC11262692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.