ArticlePloS one2024
Applicability and potential of monitored reconstruction in computed tomography.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- No Reproducibility, No Progress: Rethinking CT Benchmarking.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monitored tomographic reconstruction (MTR) is a potentially powerful tool for dose and time reduction in computed tomography scanning. We are the first to study the issue of practical implementation of MTR protocols in current-generation real-life instruments. We propose an empirical quantitative model for calculating acquisition and reconstruction times. It is demonstrated that projection acquisition order has a significant impact on the time and dose of tomographic experiments. The new alternative acquisition most suitable for MTR protocols is proposed. To estimate the restrictions and scope of applicability for MTR four typical commercial setups are studied within a proposed model. We construct an experimental stand for achieving a real-time reconstruction, together with validation of the proposed acquisition time model. We demonstrate that real-time reconstruction may be implemented without slowing down an acquisition process. An optimization of reconstruction from partial data is proposed, which allowed the production of 385 and 440 reconstructions for standard and proposed acquisition orders correspondingly during a single acquisition of 512 projections. The results of the study demonstrate that with proposed optimizations MTR can be effectively utilized for practical applications using the current generation of existing setups in industrial and nano tomography fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.