Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2024
Improving Cardiac Rehabilitation Adherence in Patients With Lower Socioeconomic Status: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03759873 (Improving Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation Among Lower-Socioeconomic Status Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improving Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation Among Lower-Socioeconomic Status Patients: Efficacy of Early Case Management and Financial Incentives
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Socioeconomic variation in the relationship between cardiac rehabilitation participation and clinical outcomes: a systematic review.Open heart · 2025Pooled it
- Social Inequality in the Comprehensive Cardiac Rehabilitation Pathway: A Nationwide Cohort Study Across Hospitals and Primary Health Care Centers.Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention · 2026Article
- A Cross-Sectional Examination of Sex-Based Differences in Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation From the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention · 2026Article
- Patients Who "No-Show" in Cardiac Rehabilitation: CHARACTERISTICS AND ATTENDANCE.Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention · 2026Article
- Association Between Copayments and Attendance in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Nationwide Analysis From the AACVPR Registry.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Socioeconomic disparities and life's essential 8: a focused review and considerations for improving cardiovascular health in the United States.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Breaking the adherence barrier: an information-motivation-behavioral skills model analysis of self-efficacy in stroke survivors' home-based exercise.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Associated Factors of Different Cardiac Rehabilitation Adherence Profiles Post-PCI: A Latent Profile Analysis.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- The effect of postoperative chemotherapy on survival outcomes and a nomogram for predicting overall survival in chondroblastic osteosarcoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Adherence to Exercise and Functional Rehabilitation Programs in Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases: Barriers and Strategies.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- The Economics of Cardiac Rehabilitation in North, Central, and South America: A Narrative Review.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2025Review
- Disparities in Geographic Access to Cardiac Rehabilitation Among Socially Vulnerable Communities.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Management capacity for stable coronary heart disease in Shanghai community medical institutions: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Comparative Effectiveness of Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin for Primary Prevention in High-Risk Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Nationwide Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Exercise prescriptions for ischemic cardiomyopathy: a scoping review.Heart failure reviews · 2025Article
- Chronic Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease: Pharmacological Treatment and Cardiac Rehabilitation.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Participation in cardiac rehabilitation is associated with significant decreases in morbidity and mortality. Despite the proven benefits, cardiac rehabilitation is severely underutilized in certain populations, specifically those with lower socioeconomic status (SES). Objective: To assess the efficacy of early case management and/or financial incentives for increasing cardiac rehabilitation adherence among patients with lower SES. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial enrolled patients from December 2018 to December 2022. Participants were followed up for 1 year with assessors and cardiac rehabilitation staff blinded to study condition. Patients with lower SES with a cardiac rehabilitation-qualifying diagnosis (myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous coronary intervention, heart valve replacement/repair, or stable systolic heart failure) were recruited. Then patients attended one of 3 cardiac rehabilitation programs at 1 university or 2 community-based hospitals. A consecutively recruited sample was randomized and stratified by age (<57 vs ≥57 years) and smoking status (current smoker vs nonsmoker or former smoker). Intervention: Participants were randomized 2:3:3:3 to either a usual care control, case management starting in-hospital, financial incentives for completing cardiac rehabilitation sessions, or both interventions (case management plus financial incentives). Interventions were in place for 4 months following informed consent. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was cardiac rehabilitation adherence (proportion of patients completing ≥30 sessions). The a priori hypothesis was that interventions would improve adherence, with the combined intervention performing best. Results: Of 314 individuals approached, 11 were ineligible, and 94 declined participation. Of the 209 individuals who were randomized, 17 were withdrawn. A total of 192 individuals (67 [35%] female; mean [SD] age, 58 [11] years) were included in the analysis. Interventions significantly improved cardiac rehabilitation adherence with 4 of 36 (11%), 13 of 51 (25%), 22 of 53 (42%), and 32 of 52 (62%) participants completing at least 30 sessions in the usual care, case management, financial incentives, and case management plus financial incentives conditions, respectively. The financial incentives and case management plus financial incentives conditions significantly improved cardiac rehabilitation adherence vs usual care (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 5.1 [95% CI, 1.5-16.7]; P = .01; AOR, 13.2 [95% CI, 4.0-43.5]; P < .001, respectively), and the case management plus financial incentives condition was superior to both case management or financial incentives alone (AOR, 5.0 [95% CI, 2.1-11.9]; P < .001; AOR, 2.6 [95% CI, 1.2-5.9]; P = .02, respectively). Interventions were received well by participants: 86 of 105 (82%) in the financial incentives conditions earned at least some incentives, and 96 of 103 participants (93%) assigned to a case manager completed the initial needs assessment. Conclusion and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, financial incentives improved cardiac rehabilitation adherence in a population with higher risk and lower SES with additional benefit from adding case management. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03759873.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.