Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39037811›Full record

Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2024

Improving Cardiac Rehabilitation Adherence in Patients With Lower Socioeconomic Status: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Diann E Gaalema, Sherrie Khadanga, Patrick D Savage, Blair Yant, Brian R Katz, Michael DeSarno, Philip A Ades

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03759873 (Improving Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation Among Lower-Socioeconomic Status Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03759873 phase2completednot on this map

Improving Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation Among Lower-Socioeconomic Status Patients: Efficacy of Early Case Management and Financial Incentives

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of VermontRan2018 to 2024Enrolled209ConditionsCardiac RehabilitationArmsIncentives, Case Management
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Patients Who "No-Show" in Cardiac Rehabilitation: CHARACTERISTICS AND ATTENDANCE.Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Diann E GaalemaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington.
Sherrie KhadangaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Vermont, Burlington.
Patrick D SavageDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Vermont, Burlington.
Blair YantDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington.
Brian R KatzDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington.
Michael DeSarnoBiomedical Statistics Research Core, University of Vermont, Burlington.
Philip A AdesDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Vermont, Burlington.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Participation in cardiac rehabilitation is associated with significant decreases in morbidity and mortality. Despite the proven benefits, cardiac rehabilitation is severely underutilized in certain populations, specifically those with lower socioeconomic status (SES). Objective: To assess the efficacy of early case management and/or financial incentives for increasing cardiac rehabilitation adherence among patients with lower SES. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial enrolled patients from December 2018 to December 2022. Participants were followed up for 1 year with assessors and cardiac rehabilitation staff blinded to study condition. Patients with lower SES with a cardiac rehabilitation-qualifying diagnosis (myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous coronary intervention, heart valve replacement/repair, or stable systolic heart failure) were recruited. Then patients attended one of 3 cardiac rehabilitation programs at 1 university or 2 community-based hospitals. A consecutively recruited sample was randomized and stratified by age (<57 vs ≥57 years) and smoking status (current smoker vs nonsmoker or former smoker). Intervention: Participants were randomized 2:3:3:3 to either a usual care control, case management starting in-hospital, financial incentives for completing cardiac rehabilitation sessions, or both interventions (case management plus financial incentives). Interventions were in place for 4 months following informed consent. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was cardiac rehabilitation adherence (proportion of patients completing ≥30 sessions). The a priori hypothesis was that interventions would improve adherence, with the combined intervention performing best. Results: Of 314 individuals approached, 11 were ineligible, and 94 declined participation. Of the 209 individuals who were randomized, 17 were withdrawn. A total of 192 individuals (67 [35%] female; mean [SD] age, 58 [11] years) were included in the analysis. Interventions significantly improved cardiac rehabilitation adherence with 4 of 36 (11%), 13 of 51 (25%), 22 of 53 (42%), and 32 of 52 (62%) participants completing at least 30 sessions in the usual care, case management, financial incentives, and case management plus financial incentives conditions, respectively. The financial incentives and case management plus financial incentives conditions significantly improved cardiac rehabilitation adherence vs usual care (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 5.1 [95% CI, 1.5-16.7]; P = .01; AOR, 13.2 [95% CI, 4.0-43.5]; P < .001, respectively), and the case management plus financial incentives condition was superior to both case management or financial incentives alone (AOR, 5.0 [95% CI, 2.1-11.9]; P < .001; AOR, 2.6 [95% CI, 1.2-5.9]; P = .02, respectively). Interventions were received well by participants: 86 of 105 (82%) in the financial incentives conditions earned at least some incentives, and 96 of 103 participants (93%) assigned to a case manager completed the initial needs assessment. Conclusion and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, financial incentives improved cardiac rehabilitation adherence in a population with higher risk and lower SES with additional benefit from adding case management. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03759873.

Indexed as

Cardiac RehabilitationPatient ComplianceSocial ClassAgedCase ManagementFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivation

Identifiers

PMID39037811
PMCPMC11264079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.