Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39037795›Full record

ArticleJAMA internal medicine2024

Prenatal Cannabis Use and Maternal Pregnancy Outcomes.

Kelly C Young-Wolff, Sara R Adams, Stacey E Alexeeff, Yeyi Zhu, Edwin Chojolan, Natalie E Slama, Monique B Does, Lynn D Silver, Deborah Ansley, Carley L Castellanos and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kelly C Young-WolffDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Sara R AdamsDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Stacey E AlexeeffDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Yeyi ZhuDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Edwin ChojolanCalifornia Department of Public Health, Richmond.
Natalie E SlamaDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Monique B DoesDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Lynn D SilverPublic Health Institute, Oakland, California.
Deborah AnsleyRegional Offices, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Carley L CastellanosRegional Offices, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Lyndsay A AvalosDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.

Funding

Maternal Marijuana Use During Pregnancy, Marijuana Legalization, and Adverse Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes: A 12-year Cohort StudyR01DA047405 · NIDA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI AVALOS, LYNDSAY AMMON, YOUNG-WOLFF, KELLY CORINNE · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
Impact of in utero Marijuana Exposure on Neurodevelopment, Behavior and Mental Health: A Longitudinal Birth Cohort StudyR01DA048033 · NIDA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI AVALOS, LYNDSAY AMMON, YOUNG-WOLFF, KELLY CORINNE · 2020 to 2025
$3.1M
Identifying Risk Factors for Prenatal Substance and Polysubstance UseK01DA043604 · NIDA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI YOUNG-WOLFF, KELLY CORINNE · 2017 to 2021
$907k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA043604NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA047405NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA048033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Many studies have evaluated whether in utero cannabis exposure is associated with fetal and neonatal outcomes, yet little is known about whether prenatal cannabis use is associated with maternal health outcomes during pregnancy. Objective: To evaluate whether prenatal cannabis use is associated with maternal health outcomes during pregnancy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based retrospective cohort study included pregnancies in Northern California from January 2011 to December 2019 that lasted 20 weeks or longer and were screened for prenatal cannabis use. Exposures: Prenatal cannabis use was defined as any self-reported use during early pregnancy or a positive toxicology test result based on universal screening at entrance to prenatal care (approximately 8-10 weeks' gestation). Self-reported frequency of use (daily, weekly, monthly or less, never, unknown), use defined only by self-report, and use defined only by toxicology test results were examined. Main Outcomes and Measures: Electronic health record data were used to define the following outcomes: gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, eclampsia, gestational diabetes, gestational weight gain greater and less than guidelines, placenta previa, placental abruption, placenta accreta, and severe maternal morbidity. Adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) were calculated using a modified Poisson regression. Results: The sample (n = 316 722 pregnancies; 250 221 unique individuals) included 84 039 (26.5%) Asian/Pacific Islander, 20 053 (6.3%) Black, 83 145 (26.3%) Hispanic, and 118 333 (37.4%) White individuals; the mean (SD) age was 30.6 (5.4) years. Overall, 20 053 (6.3%) screened positive for prenatal cannabis use; 2.9% were positive by self-report, 5.3% by toxicology testing, and 1.8% by both. The frequency of cannabis use was 1930 (0.6%) daily, 2345 (0.7%) weekly, 4892 (1.5%) monthly or less, and 10 886 (3.4%) unknown. Prenatal cannabis use was associated with greater risk of gestational hypertension (aRR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.13-1.21), preeclampsia (aRR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.15), weight gain less than (aRR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08) and greater than (aRR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.08-1.10) guidelines, and placental abruption (aRR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05-1.36). The pattern of results was similar when defining prenatal cannabis use only by self-report or only by toxicology testing, and associations between the frequency of prenatal cannabis use and outcomes varied with outcome. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cohort study suggest that prenatal cannabis use was associated with several adverse maternal health outcomes during pregnancy. Continued research is needed to understand whether characteristics of prenatal cannabis use (eg, dose, mode, and timing) moderate these associations.

Indexed as

Pregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomeAdultCaliforniaCannabisFemaleHumansMarijuana UsePregnancyRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39037795
PMCPMC11264060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.