Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39037767›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

Telemedicine and Patient Experience Ratings at an Academic Integrative Medicine Practice: Retrospective Examination.

Ellen Meltzer, Laurie Wilshusen, Isra Abdulwadood, Claire Yee, Amy Sherman, Kelli Strader, Barbara Thomley, Denise Millstine, Jon Tilburt, Heather Fields and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ellen Meltzer *Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3901-1578
Laurie Wilshusen *Mayo Clinic Quality Management Services, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9361-2601
Isra AbdulwadoodMayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9029-5815
Claire YeeQuantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1601-9163
Amy ShermanMayo Clinic Quality Management Services, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5383-1447
Kelli StraderMayo Clinic Quality Management Services, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7372-8999
Barbara ThomleyDivision of General Internal Medicine, Section of Integrative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8916-5199
Denise MillstineMayo Clinic Women's Health Center, Section of Integrative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8516-9910
Jon TilburtDivision of General Internal Medicine, Section of Integrative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6165-6415
Heather FieldsMayo Clinic Community Internal Medicine, Section of Integrative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0391-9605
Larry BergstromDivision of General Internal Medicine, Section of Integrative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2279-1559
David PatchettMayo Clinic Family Medicine, Section of Integrative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7580-5706
John CamorianoHematology/Oncology, Section of Integrative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2957-5356
Brent BauerDivision of General Internal Medicine, Section of Integrative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3453-6906

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of telemedicine (TELE) increased exponentially during the COVID-19 pandemic. While patient experience with TELE has been studied in other medical disciplines, its impact and applicability to integrative medicine practices remain unknown.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to assess the impact of visit modality, TELE versus face-to-face (F2F) encounters, on patient experience at an integrative medicine practice at a single academic medical center. Given the significant role of the patient-physician relationship, therapeutic presence, and touch in integrative medicine, we hypothesized that TELE would result in reduced patient experience compared to traditional F2F encounters.

methodsA retrospective examination of Press Ganey surveys at an academic, consultative, and integrative medicine practice was conducted. Anonymous surveys completed by patients, older than 18 years of age, who had TELE or F2F appointments from April 1, 2020, to March 31, 2023, were included. At our medical center, patients commonly travel in from out of state for complex care. We examined percentage "top box" scores (ie, the percentage of respondents who selected the most positive response category on the survey, "very good"), across a variety of experience metrics. ANOVA and chi-square analyses were completed, with a significance threshold of P<.05.

resultsOver the 36 months, a total of 1066 surveys were completed and returned (TELE: n=333; F2F: n=733). Overall, 73% (n=778) of respondents were female with an average age of 57.6 (SD 13.84) years. Most patients were English-speaking (n=728, 99.3%), White (n=1059, 92.7%), and not Hispanic or Latino (n=985, 92.4%). There was significantly higher satisfaction with access to care for TELE visits compared to F2F visits. There were no differences in satisfaction with the care provider or in overall experience. When examining the specific aspects of using technology during TELE visits, there were no differences in audio quality, visual quality, or ease of talking to the care provider based on sex. There was, however, a difference in video quality based on age, where those 80 years and older rated significantly lower video quality compared to all other age groups.

conclusionsTop-level patient experience can be attained with TELE integrative medicine visits. Additional studies, particularly those correlating positive experience findings with specific behaviors used during TELE visits, would further our understanding of the integrative medicine patient experience. In the meantime, efforts should be made to ensure a policy that promotes the ongoing provision of TELE in integrative medicine.

Indexed as

communication skillsencountersF2Fface-to-faceintegrative medicinepatient experienceTELEtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID39037767
PMCPMC11301109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.