ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2024
Implications of treatment duration and frequency for value and cost-effective price of Alzheimer treatments.
Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDisease-modifying Alzheimer treatments are becoming available. The value of the treatments will be attenuated by their complexity of delivery and monitoring, creating additional medical cost and caregiver burden.
objectiveTo estimate net treatment value using different assumptions for treatment duration and intensity.
methodsWe estimated the lifetime value of hypothetical treatments that reduce disease progression by 30% from a payer perspective, which considers cost offsets, i.e., reduced medical and formal social care costs, and quality-adjusted life-year gains, and a societal perspective, which adds reduction in caregiver burden. Estimates for gross value of the treatment were based on a prior publication, medical cost on Medicare payment rates, and caregiver time use on a survey of 21 clinics. We analyzed 5 hypothetical treatment scenarios: treatment until progression to moderate dementia with (1) biweekly and (2) 4-weekly infusions, and time-limited infusions every 4 weeks for (3) 72, (4) 52, and (5) 24 weeks.
resultsTreatment until progression to moderate dementia would take 5.7 years and generate gross value of $20,734 in direct cost offsets, $83,761 from a payer and $87,749 from a societal perspective, respectively. Added medical cost and caregiver burden for the 5 scenarios would be $44,179, $24,875, $21,632, $20,416, and $14,350, respectively. The maximum value-based price per year would be $7,687, $11,088, $47,708, $67,273, and $158,954.
conclusionsAssuming identical efficacy and safety, the net value generation of time-limited treatment is projected to be larger than that of chronic treatment. Such determination of net lifetime value can be useful to determine value-based prices for different treatment types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.