ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
A Boundary-Enhanced Decouple Fusion Segmentation Network for Diagnosis of Adenomatous Polyps.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- UBENet: Uncertainty Boundary Enhancement Network for Polyp Segmentation in Colonoscopy Images.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adenomatous polyps, a common premalignant lesion, are often classified into villous adenoma (VA) and tubular adenoma (TA). VA has a higher risk of malignancy, whereas TA typically grows slowly and has a lower likelihood of cancerous transformation. Accurate classification is essential for tailored treatment. In this study, we develop a deep learning-based approach for the localization and classification of adenomatous polyps using endoscopic images. Specifically, a pre-trained EGE-UNet is first adopted to extract regions of interest from original images. Multi-level feature maps are then extracted by the feature extraction pipeline (FEP). The deep-level features are fed into the Pyramid Pooling Module (PPM) to capture global contextual information, and the squeeze body edge (SBE) module is then used to decouple the body and edge parts of features, enabling separate analysis of their distinct characteristics. The Group Aggregation Bridge (GAB) and Boundary Enhancement Module (BEM) are then applied to enhance the body features and edge features, respectively, emphasizing their structural and morphological characteristics. By combining the features of the body and edge parts, the final output can be obtained. Experiments show the proposed method achieved promising results on two private datasets. For adenoma vs. non-adenoma classification, It achieved a mIoU of 91.41%, mPA of 96.33%, mHD of 11.63, and mASD of 2.33. For adenoma subclassification (non-adenomas vs. villous adenomas vs. tubular adenomas), it achieved a mIoU of 91.21%, mPA of 94.83%, mHD of 13.75, and mASD of 2.56. These results demonstrate the potential of our approach for precise adenomatous polyp classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.