Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39037668›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2024

Refining surgical strategies in ThuLEP for BPH: a propensity score matched comparison of En-bloc, three lobes, and two lobes techniques.

Francesco Cantiello, Fabio Crocerossa, Stefano Alba, Umberto Carbonara, Savio Domenico Pandolfo, Ugo Falagario, Alessandro Veccia, Giuseppe Ucciero, Matteo Ferro, Nicola Mondaini and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Francesco CantielloDepartment of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, 100 Catanzaro (CZ), Catanzaro, 88100, Italy.
Fabio CrocerossaDepartment of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, 100 Catanzaro (CZ), Catanzaro, 88100, Italy. crocerossa@unicz.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5114-2952
Stefano AlbaDepartment of Urology, Romolo Hospital, Rocca di Neto (Kr), Crotone, Italy.
Umberto CarbonaraUnit of Urology, GVM - Santa Maria Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Savio Domenico PandolfoDepartment of Urology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Ugo FalagarioDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Alessandro VecciaDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Giuseppe UccieroUnit of Urology, R. Dulbecco Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy.
Matteo FerroDivision of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO)-IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Nicola MondainiDepartment of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, 100 Catanzaro (CZ), Catanzaro, 88100, Italy.
Rocco DamianoDepartment of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, 100 Catanzaro (CZ), Catanzaro, 88100, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study compares the peri-operative and functional outcomes of three distinct surgical techniques in Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (ThuLEP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The main aim is to assess whether the En-bloc, Three-lobe, and Two-lobe techniques have differential effects on surgical efficacy and patient outcomes.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on patients undergoing ThuLEP for BPH between January 2019 and January 2024 at two tertiary centers. Propensity score matching was utilized to balance baseline characteristics among patients undergoing the different techniques. Surgical parameters, including operative time, enucleation time, morcellation time, energy consumption, and postoperative outcomes, were compared among the groups.

resultsFollowing propensity score matching, 213 patients were included in the analysis. Intraoperative analysis revealed significantly shorter enucleation, laser enucleation, morcellation and operative times and total energy delivered in the En-bloc and Two-lobe groups compared to the Three-lobe group. No significant differences were observed among the groups in terms of intraoperative and postoperative complications. There were no significant differences in functional outcomes at the 3-month follow-up among the groups.

conclusionThe findings of this study suggest that while the En-bloc and Two-lobe techniques may offer efficiency benefits and could be considered safe alternatives in ThuLEP procedures, the reduction in laser enucleation time and energy delivered did not necessarily translate into improvements in post operative storage symptoms or other functional outcomes for the patients. Surgeon preference and proficiency may play a crucial role in selecting the most suitable technique for individual patients. Future research should focus on larger-scale prospective studies to further validate these findings and explore potential factors influencing surgical outcomes.

Indexed as

Propensity ScoreProstatic HyperplasiaAgedHumansLasers, Solid-StateLaser TherapyMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimeProstatectomyRetrospective StudiesThuliumTransurethral Resection of ProstateTreatment OutcomeThuliumBPHBPOEn-blocLaser enucleationThree-lobeTwo-lobe

Identifiers

PMID39037668
PMCPMC11263241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.