Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39037646›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Clinical Tumor Dormancy.

Romano Demicheli, Elia Biganzoli

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Romano DemicheliUnit of Medical Statistics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, IBIC & DSRC, Ospedale "L. Sacco," LITA Campus, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. romano.demicheli@guest.unimi.it.
Elia BiganzoliUnit of Medical Statistics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, IBIC & DSRC, Ospedale "L. Sacco," LITA Campus, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This chapter summarizes clinical evidence on tumor dormancy, with a special focus on our research supporting the role of dormancy both in local and distant recurrence of breast cancer following mastectomy. Starting from these premises, we propose a model of neoplastic development that allows us to elucidate several relevant clinical phenomena, including the mammographic paradox, the significance of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after conservative surgery, and the effect of surgeries performed after the removal of the primary. We will discuss the biological implications of the dormancy-based model, which are at odds with Somatic Mutation Theory. We will then review new models, alternatives to the Somatic Mutation Theory, for cancer development, with special emphasis on the Dynamic System Theory and the originality of its conceptual approach. Finally, we will put particular emphasis on the view of cancer development as a tissue-level process. We believe that this will help harmonize the molecular biology research with the new conceptual approach and bridge the knowledge gap on dormancy between bench and bedside.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalFemaleHumansMastectomyMutationBench to bedside gapClinical tumor dormancyComplex system dynamicsDormancy-based modelTissue level cancerogenesis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.