Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39037533›Full record

ReviewDrug delivery and translational research2025

Unravelling the role of tumor microenvironment responsive nanobiomaterials in spatiotemporal controlled drug delivery for lung cancer therapy.

Dadi A Srinivasarao, Saurabh Shah, Paras Famta, Ganesh Vambhurkar, Naitik Jain, Sai Kiran S S Pindiprolu, Anamika Sharma, Rahul Kumar, Hara Prasad Padhy, Meenu Kumari and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug delivery and translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Dadi A SrinivasaraoDepartment of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER) Hyderabad, Balanagar, Hyderabad, 500037, Telangana, India. srinivasarao.ananda@niperhyd.ac.in.
Saurabh ShahDepartment of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER) Hyderabad, Balanagar, Hyderabad, 500037, Telangana, India.
Paras FamtaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER) Hyderabad, Balanagar, Hyderabad, 500037, Telangana, India.
Ganesh VambhurkarDepartment of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER) Hyderabad, Balanagar, Hyderabad, 500037, Telangana, India.
Naitik JainDepartment of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER) Hyderabad, Balanagar, Hyderabad, 500037, Telangana, India.
Sai Kiran S S PindiproluAditya Pharmacy College, Surampalem, 533 437, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Anamika SharmaDepartment of Biological Sciences, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), 500037, Telangana, Hyderabad, India.
Rahul KumarDepartment of Biological Sciences, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), 500037, Telangana, Hyderabad, India.
Hara Prasad PadhyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), 500037, Telangana, Hyderabad, India.
Meenu KumariDepartment of Chemical Sciences, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), 500037, Telangana, Hyderabad, India.
Jitender MadanDepartment of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER) Hyderabad, Balanagar, Hyderabad, 500037, Telangana, India.
Saurabh SrivastavaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER) Hyderabad, Balanagar, Hyderabad, 500037, Telangana, India. saurabh@niperhyd.ac.in.ORCID 0000-0003-0723-4363

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Design and development of efficient drug delivery technologies that impart site-specificity is the need of the hour for the effective treatment of lung cancer. The emergence of materials science and nanotechnology partially helped drug delivery scientists to achieve this objective. Various stimuli-responsive materials that undergo degradation at the pathological tumor microenvironment (TME) have been developed and explored for drug delivery applications using nanotechnological approaches. Nanoparticles (NPs), owing to their small size and high surface area to volume ratio, demonstrated enhanced cellular internalization, permeation, and retention at the tumor site. Such passive accumulation of stimuli-responsive materials helped to achieve spatiotemporally controlled and targeted drug delivery within the tumors. In this review, we discussed various stimuli-physical (interstitial pressure, temperature, and stiffness), chemical (pH, hypoxia, oxidative stress, and redox state), and biological (receptor expression, efflux transporters, immune cells, and their receptors or ligands)-that are characteristic to the TME. We mentioned an array of biomaterials-based nanoparticulate delivery systems that respond to these stimuli and control drug release at the TME. Further, we discussed nanoparticle-based combinatorial drug delivery strategies. Finally, we presented our perspectives on challenges related to scale-up, clinical translation, and regulatory approvals.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsLung NeoplasmsNanoparticlesTumor MicroenvironmentAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsDelayed-Action PreparationsHumansAntineoplastic AgentsDelayed-Action PreparationsAnd immunotherapyLung cancerNanobiomaterialsSpatiotemporally controlled deliveryStimuli-responsivenessTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.