Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39037339›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2024

Data Lake, Data Warehouse, Datamart, and Feature Store: Their Contributions to the Complete Data Reuse Pipeline.

Antoine Lamer, Chloé Saint-Dizier, Nicolas Paris, Emmanuel Chazard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Antoine LamerUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694-METRICS, Centre d'Etudes et de Recherche en Informatique Médicale, Lille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9546-1808
Chloé Saint-DizierUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694-METRICS, Centre d'Etudes et de Recherche en Informatique Médicale, Lille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5274-2943
Nicolas ParisInterHop, Rennes, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1533-5087
Emmanuel ChazardUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694-METRICS, Centre d'Etudes et de Recherche en Informatique Médicale, Lille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7841-5925

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlabelled: The growing adoption and use of health information technology has generated a wealth of clinical data in electronic format, offering opportunities for data reuse beyond direct patient care. However, as data are distributed across multiple software, it becomes challenging to cross-reference information between sources due to differences in formats, vocabularies, and technologies and the absence of common identifiers among software. To address these challenges, hospitals have adopted data warehouses to consolidate and standardize these data for research. Additionally, as a complement or alternative, data lakes store both source data and metadata in a detailed and unprocessed format, empowering exploration, manipulation, and adaptation of the data to meet specific analytical needs. Subsequently, datamarts are used to further refine data into usable information tailored to specific research questions. However, for efficient analysis, a feature store is essential to pivot and denormalize the data, simplifying queries. In conclusion, while data warehouses are crucial, data lakes, datamarts, and feature stores play essential and complementary roles in facilitating data reuse for research and analysis in health care.

Indexed as

data lakedatamartdata reusedata warehousefeature extractionfeature store

Identifiers

PMID39037339
PMCPMC11267403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.