ArticleA&A practice2024
Enhancing Laryngoscopy Mastery: The Impact of Autonomous Practice with Feedback-Providing Simulators.
Article in A&A practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The evolving landscape of airway education in anesthesia for head and neck surgery.Current opinion in anaesthesiology · 2025Review
- Using the predictive model of difficult endotracheal intubation to examine different simulators for airway management training: a pilot cross-sectional observational study.BMC medical education · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mastery learning with fixed end points and variable training time leads to more consistent expertise but is difficult to implement. Here we piloted mastery learning of laryngoscopy with independent practice. 35 learners participated in independent mastery learning on a manikin that provides automated performance feedback. A pre- and postpractice assessment of intubation skills was completed. After an average of 21 minutes of open practice, the percentage of subjects that met mastery criteria improved from 24% to 89% (P < .05). Independent intubation practice with manikin feedback facilitated mastery learning, enhanced procedural education, and may impact clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.