Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39036998›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2024

A deep learning-based toolkit for 3D nuclei segmentation and quantitative analysis in cellular and tissue context.

Athul Vijayan, Tejasvinee Atul Mody, Qin Yu, Adrian Wolny, Lorenzo Cerrone, Soeren Strauss, Miltos Tsiantis, Richard S Smith, Fred A Hamprecht, Anna Kreshuk and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Athul VijayanPlant Developmental Biology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising 85354, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1837-6359
Tejasvinee Atul ModyPlant Developmental Biology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising 85354, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8849-0088
Qin YuEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg 69117, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4652-0795
Adrian WolnyEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg 69117, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2794-4266
Lorenzo CerroneInterdsisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing (IWR), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7337-2313
Soeren StraussDepartment of Comparative Developmental and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne 50829, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7141-1750
Miltos TsiantisDepartment of Comparative Developmental and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne 50829, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7150-1855
Richard S SmithDepartment of Comparative Developmental and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne 50829, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9220-0787
Fred A HamprechtInterdsisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing (IWR), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
Anna KreshukEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg 69117, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1334-6388
Kay SchneitzPlant Developmental Biology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising 85354, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6688-0539

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft FOR2581 (TP3)Technische Universität München
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a new set of computational tools that enable accurate and widely applicable 3D segmentation of nuclei in various 3D digital organs. We have developed an approach for ground truth generation and iterative training of 3D nuclear segmentation models, which we applied to popular CellPose, PlantSeg and StarDist algorithms. We provide two high-quality models trained on plant nuclei that enable 3D segmentation of nuclei in datasets obtained from fixed or live samples, acquired from different plant and animal tissues, and stained with various nuclear stains or fluorescent protein-based nuclear reporters. We also share a diverse high-quality training dataset of about 10,000 nuclei. Furthermore, we advanced the MorphoGraphX analysis and visualization software by, among other things, providing a method for linking 3D segmented nuclei to their surrounding cells in 3D digital organs. We found that the nuclear-to-cell volume ratio varies between different ovule tissues and during the development of a tissue. Finally, we extended the PlantSeg 3D segmentation pipeline with a proofreading tool that uses 3D segmented nuclei as seeds to correct cell segmentation errors in difficult-to-segment tissues.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusDeep LearningImaging, Three-DimensionalSoftwareAlgorithmsAnimalsArabidopsisImage Processing, Computer-Assisted3D digital organ3D nuclear segmentationArabidopsisOvulePlant cellsPlantSegStarDist

Identifiers

PMID39036998
PMCPMC11273294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.